I feel like it would be best to proxy YouTube, or subscribe to paid indie channels like nebula, but without a user base and without ad revenue or subscription revenue I don’t know how quality content can come to PeerTube. Maybe I’m just missing the content but when I’ve checked it’s all very low quality, just random unedited webcam vblogs mostly.

  • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    There’s some good channels on TILVids and Kolektiva.media, and if you’re looking for something specific, Sepiasearch is able to search across all peertube instances.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    In all honesty I don’t understand how PeerTube is supposed to scale with users once it gets content. Hosting, transcoding and streaming video is super expensive. There’s also a matter of making money from videos and without financial incentive it’ll be hard to compete with commercial solutions (in a capitalist hellholes that most of us live in). Community funding can keep up with hosting text but can barely keep up with hosting pictures, let alone something more, unless you’re an internet archive or something.

    People who are on Nebula already made it in Youtube and they’re so big that they just want to make more money. They provide nice service for the money but I don’t think they will come support your revolution for free.

    • artificialfish@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I know nebula creators aren’t supporting any kind of revolution but they are creating their own coop and I commend them for that. All workers should. Maybe just an oss tool to get communities like them started for groups that want to form coops.

      In that idea what we need is a built in interface for sponsorship, tipping, and paid subscriptions, built into PeerTube. They could have subscriptions on the instance itself or the channel.

    • Dil@is.hardlywork.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I think it has more potential for shorts, if they do that, shorts get hella compressed on tiktok, ig, etc. itd be nice to self host and deal with your own compression, and just pay to serve content how you want it.

      • Dil@is.hardlywork.ing
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Maybe blender animators, vfx makers, edm visuals, etc. those type of artists would benefit most from something like peertube, dont get much visibility in youtube and peertube could be a return to artists and less whatever contents become

    • Kane@femboys.biz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I feel like PeerTube only makes sense in the case of “I have the technical knowledge to host my own instance”

      As indeed, I find it difficult to believe that any single “community”-instance will survive once it starts getting some traction. Hosting, maintaining and moderating such a platform would be extremely expensive if you have to do it for not only your own content.

    • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      PeerTube scales by increasing the amount of instances available. But you are pretty much correct. The two things that’s expensive is: Storage and transcoding. The biggest expense is storage. It gets more and more expensive as videos is uploaded. Transcoding can become more expensive, if you have to keep up with new videos getting added all the time.

      I would like to see individual content creators create their own PeerTube servers and thereby serving their content to the rest of the PeerTube servers and the Fediverse. I imagine a lot of content creators keep some kind of backup of their videos, so why not attach a PeerTube server to it? PeerTube allows you to keep the original file.

      Regarding financial incentive, the “only” thing creators would miss out on, on Peertube is ad revenue. If we disregard the low amount of viewers on PeerTube compared to YouTube, a creator can still use sponsors, patreon, donations, affiliate links etc. on their videos.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        I don’t think it’s entirely fair to say that all money on YouTube comes from ads. IIRC nearly half comes from subscriptions and each Premium watcher is basically worth much more than ad-supported ones. My thinking is similar to yours - creators need to host things themselves and the next step would be creating coops that optimise infrastructure costs and deal with stuff like payment processing for subs. Nebula is one, Floatplane is another but with LTT yuck. We need more, especially non-US based. And people need to sub those too.

        • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          You are thinking about channel membership, right? This is something that could also be implemented in PeerTube, either by Framasoft themselves (devs of PeerTube) or as a plugin by anyone.

          You mentioned LTT. They have their own video platform. It would have been cool if they had actually used PeerTube and build upon that instead of creating yet another “walled” video platform.

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            As long as artists need to support themselves in a capitalist environment it’s not reasonable for us to expect them to share their content freely. If we increase the amount of those small walled gardens then big corporations are no longer in control and we can rethink how we can compensate their work but it’s not fair to skip this step.

    • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Peertube allegedly uses p2p networking that runs in your browser to serve videos. It’s open source but when I tried to actually read up on the protocol large parts of the docs were in french

      • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        It uses P2P when multiple users is watching the same video. A PeerTube server can also mirror another PeerTube server’s videos and function as a peer.

        You can see it this screenshot, that I’ve downloaded most of the video data from other peers.

        PeerTube is build on ActivityPub, just like Lemmy. Right now federation is broken between Lemmy and PeerTube. When it’s fixed, you’ll be able to subscribe to PeerTube channels from here and comment as well.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      People who are on Nebula already made it in Youtube and they’re so big that they just want to make more money.

      Nebula is a gated community for YouTubers who have already made it. They have no avenue for adding more users, like the wealth of good indie YouTubers that are up and coming, and they don’t even seem to want to add to their own curated list themselves. Their community has been stagnated for years. All they have done is forced their current membership to constantly advertise for them on YouTube.

      Nebula is not the answer and never will be. I don’t even see a point in going there, because I already have these same channels on YouTube.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I didn’t mean Nebula would be the answer but many Nebulas that would do better or worse based on their own decisions rather than everyone being beholden to a single corporate overlord.

  • weremacaque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I haven’t checked it out yet, but the same could be said about the early days of YouTube. Professional cameras weren’t that common for the first years of it.

    • artificialfish@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yeah but that’s not the case for almost any other brand new video sharing platform. Because now people know how to content create. But they need to make money.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Yeah that’s pretty much my take.

    It sucks that content creators are fixated on advertising revenue or whatever they get from subscriptions.

    Time Team is doing really well with patreon by offering exclusive content there.

    I personally am not really sure that the peer to peer bandwidth model for peertube is the right way to go. I’m also certain that peertube is a terrible name.

    I think something federated with channels providing their own bandwidth but discoverable from other instances might be the way to go.

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I’ve found better stuff by asking around for good channels, or learning that folks I follow have made a peertube channel, than I have by trying to use the interface. The discovery isn’t especially good.

    There are only a couple decent channels I’ve watched but I get the honest impression there are more, they’re just burried in stuff. Also depends what you’re looking for. There are far more Foss youtubers who mirror over there and make decently high quality stuff than is available for a a lot of other genres of video

    There definitely isn’t much, but I think there’s potentially more than is immediately obvious

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        While I agree, I also think in the case of peertube part of it might also be that there aren’t enough people watching for viewership to clearly highlight quality videos

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s definitely part of it but also there is no way to natively feature specific channels, and the algorithms they have are completely borked. If I go to “trending” and the first video is 3 years old, that’s a problem. Also an extraordinary percentage of the content is in other languages, with no way to filter them. You can select a specific language and it just does nothing. These are just a few things that seem fairly easy to implement and would go a long way to improving the experience.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    No good content??? My man!!! Have you not heard of Nicole??? The fediverse chick!!! Watch as she mindlessly smokes a cigerette as she stares blankly at her monitor.

    Or you could try Veronica, as she uploads several videos every minute. All about Linux. Nobody knows how she does it…

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Do some searching. There are lots of great channels. I’ve posted them the last 3 or 4 times this question was asked.

    without ad revenue or subscription revenue I don’t know how quality content can come to PeerTube

    AdSense makes up a relatively small portion of revenue for most creators. Their profit comes much more from:

    • Sponsor spots
    • Direct contributions
    • Merch/personal products
    • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      yeah this is a bit like musicians or authors complaining that nobody buys their CDs and hardcovers anymore.

      YouTube can kick you to the curb just for saying fuck and demonetizing you

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I mean, your preferred PeerTube instance can do the same. The major difference is there would probably be a human doing it.

        • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          totally, but nothing is stopping you from moving to another one while still having access to the protocol. or if you can afford it, starting your own

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Moving to another one that lacks the exposure of the one you were on. You could start your own but it wouldn’t have the same traffic. It’s the same problem, just on a smaller scale.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    without ad revenue or subscription revenue I don’t know how quality content can come to PeerTube.

    I saw a video where a YouTube channel broke down their income (I’ll try and find it but there are probably similar ones out there) and the amount coming directly from ads was quite small. Other sources of money include:

    • Sponsorship
    • YouTube’s built in subscription
    • External subscriptions like Patreon
    • Merchandise
    • Physical media deals

    Like Spotify, the cut from streaming isn’t great but those on it can leverage their profile in other ways.

    The Fediverse still has a bit of a problem with monetisation but Ghost is working on joining and that is the equivalent of Substack with different subscription levels and I think most Fediverse services could do something similar. So Peertube could build in a “subscribe” button so people who enjoy your content could sign up to throw you a buck a month. Obviously a similar system could be added to the instance so you could donate to them, as hosting video is expensive.

    I do wonder if we need a FediPay/PayFed service that other services could just plug in, so you’d have a central account across your Fediverse identities - subscribing on Pixelfed could get you subscriber exclusive Peertube content.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Although, looking around, this channel has a “support” button with PayPal and Patreon links. It’s a little crude but works.

      For ease of use, it probably has to be a bit slicker and “one-click” but it’s a start.

    • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Would be interesting if Liberapay could somehow be built into PeerTube. So you simply click the “Support” button and it asks how much and then another click. Done. The rest is handled by Liberapay, which have been set up earlier.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I know of at least one. The channel is called The Linux Experiment.

    @thelinuxexperiment_channel@tilvids.com

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I enjoy his content a lot and really appreciate the fact that hés putting his content on peertube.

      I hope people enjoying Peertube are supporting the project and creators financially. Otherwise it won’t have any future sadly.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Well, like all of the fediverse. It’s a bunch of volunteers who run the instances out of pocket. They need donations to keep going.