“Star Trek: Starfleet Academy” will end with its upcoming second season, Variety has learned exclusively.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If someone had told teenage me that there would be star trek and star wars that not only would I never see but never care to see. heck sci fi in general. its wild.

  • Killer57@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I am genuinely happy to hear that Alex Kurtzman is leaving the Star Trek franchise, fuck that guy.

    • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’s not in the announcements

      Variety confirmed that CBS Studios and Kurtzman are continuing to be in negotiations for a renewed partnership.

        • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It depends on whether the intent is to integrate the movies and television.

          No one involved with the new movies has proven their ability to deliver on Star Trek, whatever their other credentials.

          It would be a major risk to give any untested production company and EP the kind of multiyear contract needed to run the franchise.

  • Q The Misanthrope @startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I have watched all of trek except TOS (just a few famous episodes only).

    I just couldn’t get into this show and that’s okay, I don’t need to love every show. Sad to see less Trek as there should be Trek for every type of audience but if they are cancelling then I’m guessing the show didn’t find its mark with people.

    I don’t know how to appeal to younger audiences, there are people smarter than me to figure that out but I hope to have a trek for me again someday.

  • Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Does that mean we’re not even going to get a nice ending for season 2?

    Hopefully they had enough of a sense it was coming to wrap things up.

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      they did allow disco to shoot additional scenes to make the season finale a series finale. I hope they allow SFA to do the same

    • billmason@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Unfortunately, they did a cliffhanger.

      Now you have to wonder if they can untangle it into one coherent finale episode, and if Paramount will even give them the approval to untangle it in the first place.

        • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m always concerned that having an unresolved cliffhanger has the opposite impact.

          It discourages new viewers from trying a show and undermines the case for a movie.

          A Firefly to Serendipity outcome is vanishingly rare.

          And unlike Farscape, the production company partner can’t get the IP back and make a limited series or streaming movie to resolve it.

          • James R Kirk@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That’s good point. I enjoyed the Discovery finale well enough but I also can’t deny it definitely felt rushed.

            I can’t say for sure if I’d prefer a rushed conclusion over a well-considered writing that gets cut short!

  • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Maybe a minority take here, but I think this is good. I liked the first season and would honestly be satisfied with it ending where and how it did. Getting another season out of it is awesome so we can flesh out the backstories and experiences of the characters that didn’t get as much development, but I think this show is better served by just a couple really good relatively self contained seasons. I would hate to see the show dragged out beyond that, personally. I got into Star Trek from Lower Decks and I like having different shows tackling different aspects of the Star Trek universe, rather than one or two long-running shows that never truly end. I think I just like an open and closed show that has an interesting story with an end in sight so the story that gets told is more fleshed out and feels more important. I’m excited for another season and want to see what they do with it!

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I agree about shows not overstaying their welcome, but for me the natural length of an Academy show would be 4 years (or however long we agree a cadet stays at the academy). After that, we could have a new Trek show with a new mission statement, but allow it to carry over a select few characters from Academy in the same way that Academy adopted a few of Discovery’s characters. That would strike me as a nice natural rhythm.

  • ragas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I couldn’t watch SFA beyond the first few minutes of the first episode. This wan’t Star Trek for me. Star Trek for me needs to be a show about a utopia.

    If you want to have a dystopic show, just don’t call it Star Trek and I will watch the shit out of it.

    • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The first episode is not a good sample of the rest of the show and genuinely feels like an entirely different writing team. The rest of the show feels more like finding and fighting for a utopia, where the first episode feels a lot more pessimistic at the idea that a utopia is even possible. I genuinely recommend skipping through the first episode as much as you want just to get the setting and characters out of it, then start actually watching from the second episode on.

    • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There is still a utopia though, it has just been tested and they failed some of the tests and now they’re trying to rebuild.

      It’s back to basics hopeful, a society trying to live up to it’s ideals again.

      • ragas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Ok, so does the series get better after start of the pilot? Because it seemed so far of that I thought there was no recovering from that.

        • zelifcam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Imagine burning calories on social media for a show you didn’t watch. It’s incredible.

          Are you that new hire at work, with a job that requires you to think on your feet, and bitches because there isn’t a 25k page book to cover every possible scenario you may encounter?

          • ragas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Sure but how much time am I willing to invest into something that looks to me like it is bad?

            • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Encounter at Farpoint was terrible too. If you got thru that, you can stomach 90210 in space as well.

              Savor the Trek that is available for I fear there will be significantly less new stuff in the future.

              • ragas@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Maybe it is because I already know TNG to be great, but I don’t think encounter at farpoint was really bad. (Was not the best either.)

                I don’t just want to watch Star Trek because of that name slapped onto it.

            • James R Kirk@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 hours ago

              you can’t invest your precious time into a tv show but you can invest your time into whining about it.

              please don’t give me any stock tips mr investor

            • ryper@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Just try to get through the whole pilot. The first stretch isn’t representative of the show.

            • zelifcam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Imagine burning calories on social media for a show you didn’t watch. It’s incredible.

              Are you that new hire at work, with a job that requires you to think on your feet, and bitches because there isn’t a 25k page book to cover every possible scenario you may encounter?

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m seriously surprised the series wasn’t canceled after the pilot. SFA has nothing to do with the look and feel of Star Trek.

    • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s how I felt about half way through the pilot, I said to my partner “I don’t think I can handle a grimdark trek,” but then they started introducing the actual premise of the show, how starfleet had a dark time, but was now rebuilding and reaffirming it’s ideals.

      I personally liked the vibe, it felt hopeful. Dark times don’t last forever and things do get better, but still leave an impact.

  • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Oh man this is really sad. I liked SFA way more than I thought I would. The cast was top notch, and they had some good stories. Genuinely sad to see this one go.

  • billmason@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Random reactions:

    • Disappointed but not surprised.
    • Even though the article leaves this an open question, I will be surprised if Kurtzman returns after this.
    • At least they didn’t memory hole S2 as a tax write off.
    • I wonder if they will attempt (and be allowed to attempt) to rework the S2 ‘cliffhanger-ish/lite’ ending into something else, or if it’s just impractical to rework a “part 1 of 2” episode into a 1 episode contained story.
    • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The odd thing is that Variety seems to be saying that, according to the same unnamed inside source, negotiations are still underway for Kurtzman and Secret Hideout to continue production for CBS Studios (which I failed to notice on my initial read of the piece).

      According to an individual with knowledge of the situation, Kurtzman and CBS Studios are currently in talks for a new deal that will keep him in the CBS fold. In addition to his work on “Star Trek,” he has produced shows like the “Hawaii Five-O” reboot, “Scorpion,” and “Salvation.”

      If so, I’m wondering if someone leaked the specific detail of the termination of Starfleet Academy with the hope of a fan campaign to save it…