don’t bother, paisley cat and haverholm are in all these threads calling anyone who didn’t like it haters

seems I was right. oh well…

why wouldn’t they? because you’ve decided they wouldn’t? and your other point is apocraphal and just strengthens the fact that lots of people don’t like it

do you have proof of review bombing? your reasoning for it not being actual reviews seems thin at best. who do you think is doing it? and why?

can I also ask why you put weight in IMDb but ignore metacritic? it’s just an aggregation site after all.

rereading you comment it seems that you feel that reviews of the show don’t count unless those people also review each episode individually? I’m not sure why you think that though? most people aren’t going to continue watching a show they don’t like so why would they then continue to review each episode?

edit: spelling and clarity

because you didn’t ask for any of those things, you asked for information and were provided it

Being fans also means you’re more likely to accept a lower bar, or to watch with rose tinted glasses. Basically you’ll all accept any old bollocks. unfortunately ever review site says the same and match the 1.7 metacritic user score of 1.7 “overwhelming negative”, the people watching it just don’t like it, no matter what the paid critics say. This show like all the others, isn’t long for this world I suspect.

SFA has a metacritic user score of 1.7 “overwhelming dislike”