

Prefacing with: Yes yes yes, we know, you hate AI
“URH SO WE DU IT ANYWAYHS! HURHURHURHURUURHURUHRH”
Fuck you, iFixit.


Prefacing with: Yes yes yes, we know, you hate AI
“URH SO WE DU IT ANYWAYHS! HURHURHURHURUURHURUHRH”
Fuck you, iFixit.


OP, if people have to do the work for you in posting sources, consider this a learning lesson as to what not to do.


I loved that movie’s version of King Ghidorah, I liked any and all of the monster scenes. The problem is that it fell to the Transformers issue, where they focused on the humans than the monsters. I didn’t care about the parents and child conflict but it tried butting in the story at many moments.


Or why Azog was there, a character who died out many years before the Hobbit journey even began. Like was Smaug, the Necromancer and the Goblin King not enough for antagonists? That’s quite stacked if you tell me.


Probably for the best. I just can’t imagine Will Smith being Neo.


I believe it’s already happening, but it’s not as straightforward as people imagined it’d be.
Like for example, the healthcare costs. I think that’s a filter to see who can survive by paying the absurd amounts. Therefore, people will die if they can’t.
Recruit people for the military, send them off into battles, eh a few hundred or a thousand die - more filtering.
Mishandling pandemics and ignoring solemn advice in how to handle them, 350k people died, what do you say President? “It is what it is” just more filtering.
So my point is, is people need to drop these fantasies of countries who actively plan to wipe out populations by sheer force and throwing bombs around.
It’s already happening because we’re dealing with con artists and cunning megalomaniacs.


Three…movies…
For an otherwise 350-page book.
I’m still not over that. My solution to the Hobbit mess was, go for broke and make one 3-hour film. If the LOTR movies were long and got extended editions, why not Hobbit? No it got 3 whole movies and so much stuff got crammed in there that honestly shouldn’t have been in there in the first place.


Yeah because Cape Town Stadium - that sounds like it’s an establishment of community. Like the name is named after something that represented that community.
But when you hear DHL Stadium, it’s like they expect you to go there, after paying tickets and be thinking about “WHA, I THINK I WANT…I WANT TO SHIP SOMETHING BUT I DON’T KNOW WHAT BUT I HAVE THIS STRONG DESIRE TO SHIP SOMETHING WITH DHL! PLEASE TAKE MY MONEY!”
That’s what they want anyways.


I roll my eyes everytime a stadium is named after some company, it’s just a reminder of how radioactive capitalism is in america.


Firefox Fanboys still: LEST IT NOT CHROME!


Yeah but my point is, we’d still have democrats in office to ensure no Republican is voted in to destroy the country from within. Gore would’ve won over Bush, we’d still have Obama, we might’ve even had Bernie Sanders or so. All politicians who’re democratic who might not just keep Reaganism alive, they have their own ways too.


We make it so Reagan still runs but doesn’t win presidency, ever, until he dies. We make sure Bill Clinton doesn’t do that incident with Monica that got him impeached so he can still have some goodwill with the people enough to make them think we want the current path he paved to continue.


That’s dumb.
What would’ve really needed to happen is to speak to the parents and the school about “hey, your child and student is doing some pretty fucked up things and they’re raising the stakes soon, so you may want to commit them somewhere or talk or smack some sense into them”


I’d pump the brakes on technology. Especially the internet.
“Does X need to be improved?” “No” “Then we don’t progress it because its current state functions and does things as efficiently right now” “Does Y need to be improved?” “Yes” “Then we research, fund and progress it”
Phones would be fun again and not just a series of rectangles with silicone. They’d have any design that they want, so long as it still functions normally as a phone would.


Envious of the people with good metabolisms who can practically eat everything in one day and gain maybe…1 pound.
Feels like anything I eat I’m going to gain like 10 pounds despite how light it was.


Most of the voters who vote Republican are usually rural. They’re the people out in the middle of bumfuck no where, with their farms, their farm animals and what little family they have. And all that they can afford are things like dial-up internet. So they’re completely out of touch with more ‘civilized’ people who’re in towns and cities.
And even so, there are people who are completely nuanced and naive to what is before them even with better access to information. They can’t and won’t challenge their intellect, they won’t question information as to what’s infront of them. Nothing. Just deliberately clueless and oblivious.


If they’re saying something I already agree with or I already know, I kind of see that as just rubbing salt in the wound so I hate them even more.
Because the worst people I knew, always told me shit I already know about so it isn’t anything surprisingly or insightful. It was just more babbling from them.
I do support the basics of Libertarianism, but I can’t support the extreme-versions of it left or right sides.


Sugar is bad for you.
Drinking sodas and energy drinks is bad for you.
Ultra-processed foods is bad for you.
Smoking is bad for you.
Alcohol is bad for you.
so on and so on.
I see Trump’s terms the same way as I saw Bush’s terms.
Bush and Trump were the blatant, chaotic and incomprehensible senile fools on the surface. It’s the people they put in their administration are the ones running the show.