• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah. Firefox will gladly make itself comfy in my 32Gb… It’s annoying because just because 80% of RAM is “used” doesn’t mean it is really.

      • mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        this; every time the ublock origin absolutists insist that everyone must use Firefox or die I just wonder if they never open more than one or two tabs anyway. hell, a sufficiently complex web app running in a single tab can make FF choke

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          You got it wrong actually. Firefox is not really actively using all the ram. It’s more like reserving it. The system does that too. When the actual used RAM gets low, Firefox releases some of this unused RAM.

        • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          tell me you have no idea how firefox and ram reserving work without saying you have no idea how firefox and ram reserving work

          jokes aside, if the system needs the ram reserved by firefox, the system will get it. it is just faster to rserve ram that is expected to maybe be needed

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    This is on my Framework Laptop:

    free -h
                   total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
    Mem:            58Gi       3,3Gi        47Gi        82Mi       8,6Gi        55Gi
    
    • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Here is my Proxmox server:

      free -h
                     total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
      Mem:           125Gi        66Gi        33Gi        24Mi        26Gi        58Gi
      Swap:          8,0Gi          0B       8,0Gi
      
      
  • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    Am i the only one who still has no problems with 8GB? Not that I wouldn’t be happy with more but i can’t remember the last time I’ve even thought about ram usage

      • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        At my last WFH job my daily setup was firefox, sublime text, slack (electron app), github desktop (also electron), and 3 terminals, one running a local dev server. It all ran fine.

      • s4if@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I use potato PC with just 8GB of ram to work. I regularly use VSCode and docker. It still run smoothly when I use it properly. lol.

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago
    % free -h
                   total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
    Mem:           125Gi        15Gi        90Gi       523Mi        22Gi       110Gi
    Swap:           63Gi          0B        63Gi
    

    I’ll use it eventually. Just gotta let the disk cache warm up.

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I have enough disk space.

        Plus my /tmp is a ramdisk and sometimes I compile large things in there (Firefox) so it is nice to let it be flushed out to disk if there are more important uses for that RAM than holding a file that most likely won’t be read again.

          • kevincox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Yes. As this is a workstation the memory use is highly variable, >95% of the time I would probably barely notice having 32GiB. But other times it is a huge performance win to have that capacity available. Sometimes I am compiling lots of stuff and 32 compilers running + ample disk cache is very important. Other times I am processing lots of data and other times I am running a few VMs.

            It is a bit of a luxury. I think if I was on a tighter budget I would have gone for 64GiB. However the price difference wasn’t that much and at least a handful of times I have been quite happy to have that capacity available. And worst case I just have everything sitting in disk cache after a warm up which is a small performance win on every small task.

  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    i mean, some games (cough cough factorio cough cough) manage to use up about 25GB of ram on my system, so it’s nice to have a buffer. now, my 64GB may be considered a bit overkill but i call it future proofing

    • Lobreeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Came here to say something similar.

      My work issued me a 128gig 64 core monster of a PC, came with front and back carrying handles.

      To run Ubuntu and write some scripts.

  • waz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Wondering how my 64gb will outlast every other part upgrade my gaming Linux box will get over the years

    • Your use case is obviously different, but I’ve gone years between system upgrades. I mostly do OSS coding, or work stuff; not gaming. The only case I can imagine needing to upgrade my little Ryzen with 16 cores - a laptop CPU - is if it becomes absolutely imperative that I run AI models on my desktop. Or if Rust really does become pervasive; compiling Rust programs is almost as bad as compiling Haskell, and will take over my computer for minutes at a time.

      When I got this little micro, the first thing I did was upgrade it to 64GB of RAM, because that’s the one thing I think you can never have too much of; especially with the modern web and all the shit that brings with it; Electron apps, and so on, absolutely chew up memory. The one good thing about the Rust trend is better memory use, so the crappy compile times are somewhat forgiveable.

      • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Somewhere around 2017 I bought an old dell precision from 2011 for $25, put a radeon rx 570 in it a few years later and used it as my main computer until last year when I finally got around to building a replacement

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      te reo Māori
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I used to run VM’s in parallel for my job, which eat RAM like candy. Other than that though, I’ve never had a use case for more than 32GB RAM.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        700 tabs + VM?

        At work I regularly kiss 32gb with everything open and a VM. When I got my latest machine I made sure to get 64 so I think I’ll be good for a while. 32 gigs lasted me from 2017 to 2024. And if I need more this machine takes 2 SODIMMS so I can install at least 96 gigs.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Fixing a SSAO bug where indices overflowed the 32bit int on the gpu I had to use 64GB. Since then I have never needed more than 32GB and at home 24 is way more than I need.

        Well, I just remembered, actually I did need more once for a fftv bug (same story, 32bit overflow) but I borrowed a 192GB pc for that.