• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    AI can do the heavy lifting, but must not be treated as an infallable machine that can do no wrong unless it absolutely malfunctions, otherwise we get yet another YouTube, Twitch, etc.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The AI embodies the bias of whatever it was trained on. Clearly they used the decisions of existing fascist mods. May Reddit burn in hell.

  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think using LLMs to HELP with moderation makes sense. The problem with all these companies is they appear to think it’ll be perfect and lay off all the humans.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I mean, what people refer to as AI today isn’t really synonymous with actual AI

        It’s been cheapened

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t think it’s that. LLM’s very much are actual AI. Most people just take that term to mean something more than that when it actually doesn’t. A simple chess engine is an AI as well.

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, LLMs could really help. Other tools without AI are also helpful. The problem with all those companies is that they don’t want to do moderating for the public good at all. Reddit could kill a lot of Fake News on it’s platform, prevent reposts of revenge porn or kick idiots just by implementing a few rules. They don’t want to

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why don’t we get AI to moderate Alexis. He stopped being relevant 10 years ago.

  • regrub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    Only if the company using the AI is held accountable for what it does/doesn’t moderate

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No.

    It is simple enough as is to confuse ai or to make it forget or work around its directives. Not least of the concerns would be malicious actors such as musk censoring our thoughts.

    Ai is not something humanity should, in any way, be subjugated by or subordinate to.

    Ever.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      thier aggressive autoban is getting everyone, regardless if you did actually ban evade or not, though not in large numbers.

  • Viri4thus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    To think we lost Aaron Swartz and this shitstain and Huffman are still with us. I don’t believe in the supernatural but this kind of shit makes a good case for the existence of a devil.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    isnt it already happening on reddit? i mean the massive amounts of accs that were banned in the last few months were all AI

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      i mean the massive amounts of accs that were banned in the last few months were all AI

      No they weren’t. Mine got banned for no reason.