• Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Life imitates art, and that art is the board game Twilight Struggle.

    (It’s a Cold War simulator, played on a world map, and Canada counts as Europe for game purposes.)

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That would be so cool if I could visit Canada without any visa or other shit.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Most EU countries have visa-free entry into Canada IIRC. I know you have to submit an eta but those are cheap and quickly approved

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Our borders are sound, and we’re not at war.

    We have a land border with Denmark and a Sea border with France.

    Let’s go !

  • pubquiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Finally an option that doesn’t involve “negotiating” with a dementia-ridden publicity whore. I’d vote YES!!!

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The US offers sheer strength, but can no longer be counted on for security or reliability. The Canadian government is smart for examining their options.

  • azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Sehr interessant!

    I’m not sure how the EU charter works for geographic limits, but Canada would be a phenomenal addition to the market, especially since the US is about to blow up NAFTA and other trade agreements with Canada and Mexico.

    • Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      If I’m not mistaken, per article 49 of the Treaty on European Union, it can’t.

      Any European State which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting them may apply to become a member of the Union. The European Parliament and national Parliaments shall be notified of this application. The applicant State shall address its application to the Council, which shall act unanimously after consulting the Commission and after receiving the consent of the European Parliament, which shall act by a majority of its component members. The conditions of eligibility agreed upon by the European Council shall be taken into account.

      The conditions of admission and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the Union is founded, which such admission entails, shall be the subject of an agreement between the Member States and the applicant State. This agreement shall be submitted for ratification by all the contracting States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

      For example, Morocco tried applying, but was rejected because it wasn’t considered an “European State”. So, from my point of view, either EU amends the article to allow non-European countries to join (maybe on the basis of cultural similarities? anyways, I don’t think it’s even feasible), or an special agreement/set of agreements to integrate it in the EU without actually making it part of the EU.

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Georgia is a EU candidate and it’s neither in Europe nor bordering a EU state. It should definitely be possible.

        • optional@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Europe is not well defined, there are different opinions where Europe ends and Asia begins. Depending on the definition you choose, Georgia can be seen as partially or even completely in Europe.

          On the other hand, there is not much discussion that the Atlantic is the western border of Europe, so Canada is definitely not in Europe.

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m pretty sure that the exact meaning of “European” is very precisely defined somewhere in the fine print. It’s an EU treaty after all.

          • Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I think originally it was meant to be focused on geographical Europe, they could use the "culturally European " reasoning as a loophole (or as the new meaning), though, but I don’t really know.

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            If Australia in in the Eurovision (European song contest), it may as well be in the Union too

  • recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I literally screamed OH SHIT! as I saw this

    As a Canadian I feel like this would be such a huge win for us.

    Gonna be real the NAFTA 2.0/USMCA trade agreement seems shaky at best, horrendously unstable at worst so maintaining current trade relations doesn’t seem sustainable unfortunately.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    This would be a nightmare for Canada. Their regulations are all aligned with the US. Products would need to be adjusted, processes would need to be changed, entire product stocks would need to be offloaded. And it would make lots of Canadian products unexportable to the US.

    Even something as simple as eggs have incompatible regulations in Europe and North America.

    • Kacarott@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It would face some form of growing pains definitely, but I think it would be far better in the long run. Especially if trump tries to shut down trade between US and Canada

    • optional@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If Trump pulls through with his plans to invade Canada and Greenland, the only Canadian products exportable to the US are artillery grenades and bullets anyway.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Products would need to be adjusted

      O no what a nightmare

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        When your economy is geared to exporting mostly to a country that will not accept products made according to the new rules it is.

    • Pistcow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Am American, would love Canada to go to EU standards and have America suffer of follow suit.

      • Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, I was thinking that, if Canada’s standards are so similar to the US’s, the problem is adjusting to the new ones, and not the difference between them per se.

        • lemmus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          There is a UKCA standard that has likely aligned some of Canada’s goods with EU regulation (given the UK’s current close alignment to EU regs).

    • albert180@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Well washing the natural protection layers off from eggs and then having to cool them is pretty stupid, so it’s obvious who should adjust their standards

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        similarly stupid is not washing the eggs and then still refrigerating them because people assume it’s necessary because they see it in stuff from the USA even though it wasn’t like that for their entire life and everything was fine

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well it’s illegal (in the EU) for stores to refrigerate them as that would risk condensation forming when consumers transport them back home. Once at home refrigerating them is perfectly fine, in fact cartons might come with both “best before” and “to be refrigerated by” dates: If you want to keep them longer, put them in the fridge, if not, don’t bother.

            • moody@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              It’s not much of a waste. The fridge is going to be running anyway, with or without the eggs, isn’t it?

              • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                supermarkets don’t just have empty fridges running though… if they didn’t have eggs there, they’d fill it with other produce that they’d sell (and wouldn’t likely fill it with things they wouldn’t sell: supermarkets like spoilage even less than energy waste), or they’d not have that section refrigerated

    • Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      For the regulations, I think slowly changing them to fit to EU standards, so industries can catch up, would be the best.

      As for exports towards the US, aren’t there already institutions (like the Trade and Technology Council) used by US and EU for trade to be efficient despite regulation and standard diferences?

      Of course, I don’t much about anything, so I’m mostly throwing stuff at the wall and see what sticks.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The problem with slowly is that a Canadian membership is being discussed as an answer to Trump threat to torpedo the western economy during this year. It would be more productive to focus on what trade agreements can be done in that timeframe instead of focusing on a goal that would take decades.

        • Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Better slowly and supported by trade agreements than not at all (even with the trade agreements). Even if the US doesn’t devolve into a dictatorship/autocracy.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Guyana has 120/240V 50/60Hz depending on where you are so, no, not even France has a unified grid.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Retooling the entire country would be a shit show at best, and prohibitively expensive, so they’d likely stay at their current spec. Also, energy trade is quite profitable, and for geographic regions it makes sense to keep standards aligned.

          • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It’s not about selling electricity, it’s about having a single market for electrical devices. There’s no single market if most products don’t work in one country. Even different AC plugs are only allowed because adapters are cheap and using different plugs for Ireland and Italy is a minor change in the production line.

            • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Italy and Denmark are only different for earthed plugs, IIRC. Outside of the former British Empire, unearthed plugs within the EU are standard.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Nah Italian sockets have a different prong spacing. It’s close enough for europlugs to fit but those are only for low amperage applications.

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              You do realize that many companies offer multiple or variable power supplies addressing different input voltages and frequencies, right? Most consumer electronics are functionally identical, they just have a varying types of charging cable mains adapters. Larger appliances and tools are a different story, but more manufacturers are offering variability in their equipment.

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              It’s theoretically possible with HVDC (high voltage direct current), as the AC -> DC -> AC transmission conversion allows linked grids to not have their AC waves synced, though that distance would probably be stretching the boundaries of distance.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Not really, no. There’s a link in the works between the UK and Iceland, hopping to Greenland and then to Canada would actually be shorter distances. Mostly it hasn’t happened yet because Iceland isn’t much of a fan of it, they enjoy their cheap electricity and don’t want to plaster their whole country in geothermal. Cable length isn’t an issue.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I didn’t even think about that one as an effective barrier to trade. That would be a shit show of epic proportions. The most realistic solution would be to make all products dual voltage to protect the single market, either directly or through a transformer in their power cable, but that would increase costs for everyone.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Okay everyone, time to get started working on a Eurovision entry.

    • Speiser0@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Eurovision is organized by the european broadcasting union, not the european union.

        • Speiser0@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          As said, EBU, not EU. Israel is member of EBU, Canada is not. And joining EU makes no difference.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Canada is associate member of the EBU. Thing is you can only be a full member if your territory falls within the EBA, which isn’t even defined by the EBU but the ITU.

            There’s precendence for associate members to participate in the ESC, though, to wit, Australia, and if Canada were to become a EU member I bet they’d also be allowed in. I also very much doubt the organisers would deny Greenland entry.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I mean, arguably, conditions permitting, you don’t necessarily need to be an actual, full fledged member of anything to participate. But in any case, yes, please do, we need new blood.