• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Makes sense for any country tondo this because as has become clear, it doesn’t matter if you’re a democracy or a dictatorship, if you are liking musk and face or not, X and meta can and will destabilize your country and once it happens, there is nothing you can do about it except banning the entire site, which will be an unpopular choice.

    Musk especially has shown to be all about himself and he’ll just push whatever political right wing party to destabilize a country.

    Fuck x, fuck Facebook

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      5 days ago

      Is there any way to hide embedded images on lemmy?

      These are pretty annoying.

        • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          Always one of the first things I install with a new Arch Linux install! Not because it’s useful or anything, I’m not delusional, but because it’s hella cool

          • sharpratchet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            A modern use case: I like RSS in my terminal so I use newsboat but hate it opening firefox and swapping me out of the terminal when I want to read more. So I have it use lynx instead.

            I also have a computer without a DE that can browse the web (lynx), look at pictures (JP2a), watch movies (I don’t recall the name of the program but it converts the video to ASCII), edit word docs (take your pick), and send email (mail).

      • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        robot with sign "no fun allowed"

        as a PSA, before 🫵you post images on the internet, it’s important to put alt text whenever you can. Some people need screen readers to acess the web, and it can give context to help understand it. Give a good description, and if there’s text on it, include that in the alt text. Acessibility is important!

  • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Meta’s anti-LGBT rules are closely knit to their ending the fact-checking: It is science denialism and linked to racism and vaccine skepticism.

    Homosexuality and gender identity are not considered mental illnesses, Sex is not a binary, and Race is not connected to intelligence.

    Bigots never liked science on these three, and now they use political power to impose their narrative.

    Meta never moderated such discourse. Nor reddit nor twitter nor youtube. There was no censorship to end here. What this is, it is a free pass to punch down trans and gay people. It is incitement to violence, and Zuckerberg and Musk must go to the gallows for it.

    Don’t get me started on the toxic harassment these platforms have allowed against African and Carribean reparation activists, how they have destroyed the lives of feminists, and how they have named all Palestinians terrorists.

    At this point race realists and gender essentialists have ensured political and technological control of the narrative.

    There is no room for debating sealioning trolls on this one. If they don’t understand the social dynamics against gender/sex/minorities at this moment, they are no better than brownshirts.

    It is permabans and hooks and jabs all the way, for every single weird freak that backs this deranged hateful shit.

    • irreticent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It is permabans and hooks and jabs all the way, for every single weird freak that backs this deranged hateful shit.

      I agree. As a mod on LW myself I have to wonder how far the admin are willing to go to enforce such a policy. Are they really going to start removing mods for banning trolls and bigots‽

      *Edit: oops, I got the posts mixed up. I thought this was the post about lemmy.world’s new policy on debating trolls instead of banning them.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Good. At least someone is saying something. More people and companies should voice their opinion.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 days ago

    According to the extrajudicial notice, this allows users to associate sexual identity to “a mental illness or abnormality” and allows “the defense of professional limitations based on gender.”

    Why does anyone associate with this site. It’s beyond me.

  • CodandChips @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Brazil gives Meta 72 hours to explain new fact-check policies>

    Meta: we don’t have any

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      They do, tho. It’s community notes. If multiple people agree on a correction, especially if those people usually disagree with eachother, it becomes the note

    • deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 days ago

      Enjoy it while it lasts. We like to immitate the US so in 2026 it’s very likely that we’ll elect a reactionary idiot again.

        • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          If we ban social media companies* we won’t.

          Privately owned social media is a tool of media manipulation. You can change the weights of some inscrutable algorithm and boost exposure to political ideologies that you want while no one can truly make a case against you, “it’s just the algorithm” they say. There’s no scenario where they should be allowed to exist in a sovereign country.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Community note: Bribes are illegal and won’t be tolerated in sparkly clean Brazil.