Dude, how is bitwarden hosting your own, locally encrypted (in FOSS client) password database any different than using keypass and syncing it however you want?
I don’t even use Bitwarden myself, I’m using keepass too, but this attitude is … weird?
Trusting one FOSS client good. Trusting different FOSS client bad. Logic where?
What about Deep Purple?
This is physically impossible for me. Not sure if it’s my short legs or what but I have to really, REALLY flex muscles and twist my hip joints to be able to cross my legs and it’s fucking uncomfortable (both for joints & muscles and also by squeezing my balls). I have no idea whether my hips are weird or what, but yeah, that’s a big no no for me.
Yes, lead developer is on .ml and also fits my description.
It’s pretty simple in general: .ml is pretty much left leaning or straight up communist/socialist, while .world is mixture of the rest meaning centre to right (as everyone leftist is already on ml or hexbear, or lemmygrad).
I discovered Alexandrite on desktop and it looks pretty damn good too. And it’s pretty fast.
Any idea what should I get for my NAS then? I’ve been looking at Lexar NM790 as one of the contenders, others being Seagate Firecuda 530 and WD RED SN700. My target is 2TB not too expensive nvme drive.
Yes, but it’s a guy dog.
Bitwarden client is FOSS same as Keepass, though. Why aren’t you afraid of Keepass having backdoor by “insert whatever big corporation sponsoring FOSS” giving said companies free access to your passwords you happily store in their clouds?