

I don’t think LibreWolf should allow that DRM crap and other vanilla shit like that, but I don’t quite understand the project aim. Is it to be a browser for daily-use or a browser that is to be used only for when you want extra privacy (so it doesn’t try to be convenient)?
Mullvad is quite broken for daily-use, and I guess it wasn’t designed for that anyway. You can’t save password, cookie exceptions seems to not work properly… you seem to have to either erase everything when you close the browser or erase nothing, so in that way LibreWolf is way more friendly for daily-use - I especially liked being able to add Enhanced Tracking Protection exceptions, because I few sites I visit has CORS chatboxes.
So although very configurable for daily use, the out of the box experience suggest the project is not for that?
If everyone using allows saving browsing history, passwords, and add cookie exceptions, I guess those should be the default (most bad reviews I saw complained about it, because not having those as default put it into the “inconvenient” class of Mullvad and Tor), and a prompt asking if you want to stay logged to that site when you save a password so that it’s automatically added to exceptions would be nice too hehe
Hmm, yeah, perhaps it’s better not to have those by default, as it is privacy/security‑oriented… It would be fun to discover how many users change those settings though, if only they gathered telemetry data xD
I just remembered this documentary I watched about industrialized food, and when they created cake‑mix powder in the '50s the housewives didn’t like it because they didn’t feel like they were making the cake, so the industry removed the dried eggs from the recipe just so the housewives would have to add the eggs and whisk the cake themselves and feel like real bakers… look at us, we are so selective about our software and like to fine‑tune it to our needs. If it already came all configured for us, we would feel like normies hehe