It is clear that the signal to noise ratio of the WWW is getting worse. It’s much harder to find good content when using a good old search engine. And if it’s good it is usually hosted on Reddit or Stackexchange.

So remember, even if it’s easy too Google something (well, it isn’t nowadays), we want to create a fediverse of good content that helps people (I hope). So, it’s always better to write a real answer if you have the time and energy. Please help boost the SNR and reverse the AI fueled information degradation loop.

  • lol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I disagree. Questions that can be easily looked up using a search engine are actually adding to the noise. There really is no reason to have redundant and possibly outdated copies of information on here if an original source can easily be looked up and isn’t going anywhere.

    It’s also just plain disrespectful to expect people to look stuff up for you because you just couldn’t be bothered to type your question into a search engine yourself and perhaps look further than the first few results.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      For the last decade, the vast majority of helpful results for obscure things has been reddit posts of users asking the exact same question. Usually the person answering knows some context that the person asking isn’t aware of needing to include in their question, which is why they couldn’t find it on their own. Heck, a lot of the time I was missing the same piece of information!

      Without someone answering the ‘easy’ question, there wouldn’t have been any results that were clear answers to those questions.

      • lol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I think we’re not talking about the same kind of questions here. Questions about “obscure things” someone “couldn’t find [the answer to] on their own” are almost by definition those that cannot be easily looked up using a search engine.

        I’m talking about questions like “When is Easter in 2025?”, “What does the W in George W. Bush stand for?”, “Where will the next Tailor Swift concert take place?”, “Who is the oldest member of The Beatles?”.

        Those are different from questions like “Can you recommend a children’s book about bears for a 4 year old?”, “Which smartphone should I buy as an environment-conscious person?”, “My car is making some kind of scratchy noise. What could be the cause?”.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          When asking about the Beatles, are they asking about those still living or all of the founding members? Sice many bands have changed members over time, could they be asking about the time in the band or their age in years?

          Suse, this was easy for the Beatles since they had a single lineup and are popular enough that all of that is easy to find. But it is a good example of a simple question that could be asking different things based on context and even if they get an answer it isn’t necessarily what they are looking for, but they didn’t know how to ask. Follow up questions are possible when interacting with others who may point out missing context, but not for search engines.

          Also, kind of funny that you are an instance with ‘discuss’ in the name and you are opposed to discussion about easy to search things.

          • lol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            When asking about the Beatles, are they asking about those still living or all of the founding members? Sice many bands have changed members over time, could they be asking about the time in the band or their age in years?

            Either way it would be easy too look up. The person asking would be aware of what they actually want to know after all.

            you are opposed to discussion about easy to search things.

            No, I’m saying questions with definite answers that are easy to look up are unnecessary noise. On the contrary, those are exactly the kind of questions that do not invite discussion. I’m all for people discussing anything they like. But if you’re just wondering how many ancient world wonders there are, maybe have a look at the Wikipedia article first.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              I’m all for people discussing anything they like. But if you’re just wondering how many ancient world wonders there are, maybe have a look at the Wikipedia article first.

              El oh el

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I know right? People conversing about their problems?! The nerve!!! This is MY space, not theirs. People should only be allowed to post what I approve!!! and I do NOT approve oc asking for help, those fucking betacucks. let me scroll linux memes in peace

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Then don’t answer and move on. Most of the time I see someone say “JuSt GoOgLe It” they don’t understand the question.

      Stack overflow is garbage because questions were answered a long time ago and those answers have become irrelevant over time.

      There’s also no reason to be toxic.

      • lol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        That’s exactly what I do. I’m also not saying people should actually comment “JuSt GoOgLe It” or be otherwise toxic. Just that unnecessary questions exist that add more to the noise than to the signal.