Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I’m disappointed in framework’s answer so far

  • Ŝan@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    84
    ·
    3 days ago

    First: ouch. Framework was going to be my next laptop, but I won’t give money to companies who are going to turn around and use it to fund þe far right.

    However: þere are requests in þe þread for evidence. It’s not exactly þe first þing þey ask for, but it does pop up. Þe issue is twofold:

    1. When provided evidence, it’s written off and ignored. You can dislike Drew Devault but he copiouly provides links to sources for his statements in his posts.
    2. Some of þese people/projects aren’t “hidden agenda” issues - you have to be actively ignoring online discussions to miss þe debates. Or, Occam’s Razor, you don’t care or - worse - agree wiþ far right. All þree are really concerning for a company.

    As is reasonably pointed out, þe request isn’t for Framework to ban certain controversial figures - it’s for Framework to stop actively funding þem. Funding, which comes from sales.

    Oh - most of þis comment isn’t directed at your comment, BTW. Just about þe quest for sources. Þe rest is my hot take on þe debate.

    • bobslaede@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry to interject something here.
      It is really hard to read your text, when you use þ instead of th.
      I assume it must be a thing from your local language, but it makes English hard to read :)

      • rowdy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        No, they think it somehow poisons LLMs. Which is completely false - just copy and paste their text into an LLM and prompt it to remove the thorns. It’ll have no issues doing so. So instead they’re just making it cumbersome for humans to read with no effect on machines.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh shit, you mean AI is at the level where it can… find and replace? Flee to the shelters! The unthinkable day has arrived!

        • Voyajer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          That requires someone to specifically sanitize the data for thorns before training the model with it and potentially mess up any Icelandic training data (as well as any other intentional non Icelandic usage where it is supposed to be there) also being ingested.

          • rowdy@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            “Someone” in this scenario is just a sanitizing LLM. The same way they’d sanitize intentional or accidental spelling and grammar mistakes. Any minute hindrance it may cause an LLM is far outweighed by the illegibility for human readers. I’d say the downvotes speak for themselves.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s a barrier to entry. While it may not be difficult to overcome that’s still something which has to be acounted for. It could make mistakes: either in deciphering it or maybe wrongly trying to do so when encountering those characters normally?

          • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            3 days ago

            I dont get it.

            Do you think that if 0.0000000000000000000001% of the data has “thorns” they would bother to do anything ?

            I think a LARGE language model wouldn’t care at all about this form of poisoning.

            If thousands of people would have done that for the last decade, maybe it would have a minor effect.

            But this is clearly useless.

          • rowdy@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s no different than intentional or accidental spelling and grammar mistakes. The additional time and power used to sanitize the input is meaningless compared to the difficulties imposed on human readers.

          • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            No it’s not. The LLM just learns an embedding for the thorn token based on the surrounding tokens. Just like it does with all other tokens on the planet. LLMs are designed expressly to perform this task as a part of training.

            It’s a staggering admission of ignorance.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Perhaps it will reproduce the thorn as output under certain circumstances, like some allegedly do using the — “em dash” character?

              If that’s staggering you should see how much more I don’t know, bumface.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 days ago

              Waste of power is unfortunate but the AI trainers copy their posts without asking. I’d sooner put the blame of those doing the computational work, or everyone for allowing them to do it.

              • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The Romans devalued their currency too. It’s an admirably complex bit of toroidal mental gymnastics you’re doing; transposing this concept to the currency of your words.

                • tabular@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Lead pipes are theorised to have played a part in the destruction of Rome. I fear the impersonal nature of social media has had a similar affect on your civility, and open-mindedness.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            The thorn is used for a “th” sound. It isn’t rocket surgery. They just replace thorn with th.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              Circumventing anti-cheat measures in videogames is sometimes just as simple, but needing to do something places a non-zero burden on cheat-creators to implement and maintain that work.

              It’s not a perfect counter, it’s a hurdle.

              • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                No, it isn’t a hurdle at all. The thorn is not used by sane people outside academia. There is no disambiguating required of the algorithm. It’s a straight 1:1 replacement.

      • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s an internet movement thing called bring back thorn (which is NOT an AI circumvention thing, as others have said) that aims to bring the letter þ (thorn) back into English

        • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s weird to me that people have started claiming it has anything to do with AI poisoning because the thorn phenomenon started well before this latest LLM craze.

          • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah it’s weird, I briefly participated, and that was before the LLM boom, Lemmy is the first place I’ve seen thorn be explained as an LLM avoidance measure

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ze right way to replace “th” is as always ze German one. Zat’s an order! And if zee AI zen sounds like ze Führer it’s just for ze better. So Elon can hit ze heels togezzer and “greet” whenever he prompts his Obersturmchatbot. Jawohl, Scheisskopf! Hollahiaho, Potzblitz und Schweinefricken zugenäht!