I’m not sure how it’s gonna “rewrite history” beside the history of that place. Continous habitation from neolithic to iron ages isn’t even unprecedented, hell there are places that are inhabited continously from neolithit to today, like Damascus. Not even the article offers explanation for that sensationalist headline.
I’m not sure how it’s gonna “rewrite history” beside the history of that place. Continous habitation from neolithic to iron ages isn’t even unprecedented, hell there are places that are inhabited continously from neolithit to today, like Damascus. Not even the article offers explanation for that sensationalist headline.
Thank you for saving me.
yeah the headline is a little bombastic, but the article itself was interesting