My other pet peeves besides these:
- Android locking screen a second before I jab the screen, every single time
- YouTube app. Android and smart TVs. What’s wrong with it? (Vague overall gesturing) It’s garbage. How is one of the biggest tech companies in the world able to ship this and expect people to pay money for subscriptions is beyond me.
Applications that steal focus more than once in their startup are the real devil
My favorite way to share files is to compose an email and attach the file. I then save it as a draft and then go to another computer and open that draft and download the file. Its the best method and it has worked for at least a decade. Sometimes you have to send it to yourself but the method is perfect
Another quick fix is to set up a “Note to Self” group in Signal (make a group with 2 people then remove the other member). Nice tidy way to move things around, it also helps to find things you moved earlier
I recently wanted to send a file from Linux to an old tablet over Bluetooth. Can’t be done apparently. I can send it to my phone, a windows laptop can send it to the tablet, but my Linux PC apparently can’t. Still baffled about it.
I wanna… I have a dream where computers don’t create their own problems to solve and are not used to shoehorn in the desires of rich people and give us a future that we didn’t ask for.
My own pet peeve is UI components whose associated action is divorced from the components interaction feedback.
For example, a button that seems visibly pressed (even lights up! Maybe there’s even audio or haptic feedback!) but once you release, nothing actually happens because you were supposed to press it or hold it down for slightly longer.
This even happens with physical controls: in some elevators you can press a floor button such that it lights up momentarily, and even beeps, and yet the elevator doesn’t register the command and you have to press again, longer.
I have this experience with a certain type of pedestrian traffic light “button”.
I quote button, because nothing physically moves when you press it. I’m not sure if it registers pressure or heat, but you don’t even feel anything move when you press it.
Usually when you press the button, a red text lights up on the button, telling you to wait. This text gives you feedback that the button registered your press, and the traffic light will schedule a green light for you.
However, sometimes you didn’t press hard enough, and the text doesn’t light up. Simple solution: press harder.
But there is a scenario where it doesn’t matter how hard you press, the button won’t light up. You keep staring at it, while slamming the damn thing with the fury of a Hulk wealding Mjolnir. Still, nothing lights up. The reason: the light instantly went green, so it never needed to light up the text telling you to wait. And all that time slamming your fist on the button, could have been spend crossing the intersection. Instead you have been standing there, looking like a drunk person having a fistfight with an inanimate object.
I’ve actually noticed this exact thing with elevators before… I was kind of amazed the beep and light were hooked up completely independently from the actual floor selection logic.
It sort of makes sense that the light in the button would just be hooked directly up to the button contacts. The computer would then be polling the buttons separately and it’s possible to miss a button press… These sorts of buttons shouldn’t need a debounce period since pressing any of them a second time doesn’t do anything. If the buttons were interrupt based, this probably wouldn’t happen.
As with all open problems in computer science, we solved these back in the 80s.
Discord steals focus 3 separate times on startup. It’s so goddam infuriating. Battle.net does at least twice.
Steam does as well.
I found out recently that KDE has a “Focus stealing prevention” in their settings and it has been glorious.
Ooh! I need to look that up.
Happy cake day!
Thanks!
For 2, one of the few pieces of Windows software that I haven’t been able to replace in Linux is GetRight. Many HTTP servers support downloads starting at an offset from the beginning of the file, and GetRight uses that to allow download pausing and resumption.
It was a real life saver back when I had an extremely flaky Internet connection.
Have you tried JDownloader?
Firefox does that out of the box.
Wow, getright! That’s a throwback. I used that in the 90s.
On linux I use aria2c for similar tasks. It can resume http downloads, as well as split them up into multiple threads for faster downloading.
It’s cli-based and powerful (therefore perhaps a bit confusing at first), but there are UIs for it as well for a more get-rightty experience.
I think jdownloader also has some application here, though it’s mostly for getting things from those ad-filled file hosting sites frequently used by those on the high seas
Why would you multithread it except for heaving mutiple paths of entry to your home connection or you are getting a throttle from the file hoster?
Nice, a relevant xkcd that I didn’t guess before clicking the link! Well done!
I’m pretty sure that 5 is a feature because the button that moved is usually replaced with a clickable ad.
- Yes I hate this so much.
- Use a better window manager.
- Use a better web stack.
- Don’t most browsers support this?
- https://wormhole.app/
Don’t most browsers support this?
but not all web servers. often it’s disabled
I love it so much when reddit clients think they are smarter and they renumber points 5 to 1 as 5 to 9…
It’s not the client, it’s markup.
this is not a defined thing in markdown, just the markdown renderers of some clients do it
This here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list
Ordered lists use numbers followed by periods:
- Bird
- McHale
- Parish
It’s important to note that the actual numbers you use to mark the list have no effect on the HTML output Markdown produces. The > HTML Markdown produces from the above list is:
<ol> <li>Bird</li> <li>McHale</li> <li>Parish</li> </ol>
If you instead wrote the list in Markdown like this:
- Bird
- McHale
- Parish
or even:
- Bird
- McHale
- Parish
you’d get the exact same HTML output
hmm, you are right. it’s not actually a bug in the renderer then
for 1: kdeconnect or warpinator
is it right that both of these only work on LAN?
I think so, at least Warpinator. Try Syncthing, it operates on pure magic.
I use Syncthing for other purposes, but I think it’s pretty complicated for a one-off transfer.
given that most people use windows, it is:
- download exe
- run exe
- attempt to teach the other person to not be scared of the “hacker window” that popped up
- exchange IDs
- accept folder, find a place for it
exchangeing IDs is especially tricky if you both are in a call, and the PC does not have a messaging account that can reach you, because they live on their phones or something
Probably not basic user friendly, true, but the upside is that you set it up once and can send files all the time by just placing it in a directory, doesn’t get simpler than that.
Honestly, when I open a new application I normally want to interact with it now. Always drove me nuts , when I opened a Powershell window in a folder and then had to click on it again.
I think it’d be nice if there was an OS-app version of the web browser middle-click. I never feel confused about whether an opened link is or is not taking focus because I shared my intent by which mouse button I used (left: open and switch, middle: just open).
Until its a popup and you’re entering a password.
Or it took several seconds to load.
Printers.
Printers are solved now, you just don’t have one.
Printers are a fucking gawd damn scam
