• Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That’s my major critique point of Graphene - it’s nice and all, but directly or indirectly supporting Google is pretty contrary to my goal. And, ofc, I’d much rather have a fairphone. I’d wish they’d support Google’s special security features too.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Special security features? Fairphone either doesn’t or improperly supports basic security features. They’re late on security patches, their implementation of verified boot is broken, and generally their security is worse than any other major phone brand.

          • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 hours ago

            All of it, custom roms dont help at all. For example custom roms dont solve their broken implementation of verified boot or how they used public keys for verified boot. In addition custom roms rarely go out of their way to add security patches that the OEM hasnt added themselves. For example, GraphineOS relies on Google to publish security patches in a timely manner for them to keep GraphineOS secure. GraphineOS can trust Google because they have a proven track record of publishing open source security peatches in a timely manner while Fairphone has proven to be the exact opposite.