• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Why doesn’t she write a book about whatever unimaginable horrific childhood trauma turned her into such a vile adult?

  • emberpunk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    lol says the person who hid behind initials because having her real name on cover would hurt her sales due to sexism.

    Her? Appropriating a gender? Wow never ever /s

    What a fraud

  • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    She wrote a whole series about how bigotry is bad but in retrospect, it feels like she didn’t really understand why bigotry is bad. She just needed her children’s books to have a moral message and she made a very surface level parallel to the holocaust. Then years later, she showed her ignorance about the holocaust by denying that transgender people were a target.

      • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Probably the most problematic thing in the Harry Potter books is the pro-slavery propaganda with the house elves, which the filmmakers wisely omitted

  • clarinet_estimator@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The reason is simple: she’s a bigot. She has been successful at pushing her transphobic agenda into UK law, and she will continue to move across the spectrum because hate only knows how to hate even when they succeed.

    This is exactly the reason I’m shifting from just warning people that buying her shit is immoral so outright calling them bigots for supporting bigotry. If they don’t want to be bigots they can stop giving her their goddamn money.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I disagree with this take. Buying HP stuff won’t change anything. Not “it will change very little”. It will actually do nothing. If the whole world decided to stop buying anything that gave her money, it wouldn’t change her lifestyle at all. She already made enough money that she never has to consider it for her lifestyle. People might as well enjoy what they like and not have one more thing weighing on their mental health. Let people have their escapism.

      • AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You sure about that? Generally, people worth boatloads still cry about losing worth and refraining from encouraging IP’s directly benefitting her could distract her or even send a message to her potential allies. It would maybe not change her ways, but it could change the platforms available to send her harmful ideas into the world.

        Then for escapism, piracy is still available. 🏴‍☠️ There’s also no shortage of things to do that don’t concern her.

        • JillyB@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          refraining from encouraging IP’s directly benefitting her could distract her or even send a message to her potential allies.

          I also think that isn’t worth it. You’re still letting some rich moron’s actions have too much sway over your mental health. What you’re describing is the most tiny of marginal gains. Her IPs are already dying in relevance. Your energy would be better spent telling people about how cool some other thing is rather than how bad HP is. If someone loves HP and it makes them happy, I see no benefit to raining on their parade.

          • clarinet_estimator@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            The thing is - there are millions of other things that you could find enjoyment in that don’t actively harm other people.

            How about, for example, the plethora of IP that JKR plagiarized to create the HP franchise? Or anything that doesn’t have harmful stereotypes of various marginalized peoples? Or one that doesn’t degrade women’s roles in society by actively mocking main characters, or even passively by only having a grand total of 28 named women characters across over the one million words that make up the series?

            Edit: apologies, I misremembered. There are 28 named women characters within the top 100 named character as listed by number of total mentions within the series.

            Even if she weren’t a bigot, and she didn’t use her money to actively harm people using the money she makes, you would still be better off finding some other form of media to enjoy. You don’t have to land on one thing and make it your personality for the rest of your life. It’s okay to grow as a person especially if you’re an adult.

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 hours ago

              You don’t have to land on one thing and make it your personality for the rest of your life. It’s okay to grow as a person especially if you’re an adult.

              Agreed, so why are you still worrying about Harry Potter (somehow) harming people? It’s time to move on from that 90’s rhetoric.

      • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You should encourage them to pirate any JK Rowling-associated content, then, if these people cannot be assed to read different books by different authors. Though obviously you’re 100% correct in that she’s already fabulously rich and a boycott of her works will not materially harm her. Also, she still has devoted bigoted fans who love being paypiggies, so a boycott is impossible.

    • Coding4Fun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I support and share most of your opinions. She is a huge bigot and should be accountable for her actions. My only point is that we have kids and teenagers still consuming her books and products that are completely unaware of what is happening and shouldn’t be called out because of that.

      • clarinet_estimator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        While I don’t disagree I think it’s important to keep in mind that kids and teenagers aren’t stupid - they are capable of understanding that you shouldn’t allow a bad person to continue to be a bad person if you have a conversation about why what JKR is doing is bad. Most of the vocal pushback that I’ve experienced offline has actually come from teenagers.

        The problem lies squarely with millennial parents who continue to buy books/movies/games/merch for themselves or their young children because of nostalgia. They are old enough to know better, and should be held responsible for their actions.

  • dan00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are very few people that can turn my stomach up like this bitch.

  • Anissem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’d think this dumb cunt could just fuck off and enjoy her fortune, but no

    • abcdqfr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is literally fun to these people. Foaming at the mouth gives them energy, it’s all they can run on anymore. Vapid angst.

  • Binette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    the goal of the lgbt isn’t to only reduce oppression. it’s also to raise awareness, because some people might not realise that they might be gay, bi, trans or ace, since our society is heteronormative.

    i didn’t know that being ace was a thing, and i felt sad and frustrated that i didn’t have any crushes or felt sexually attracted to anything. when i found out about it, it was relieving that i wasn’t alone. even now when people doubt me or say “you’ll get over it”, i don’t pay mind to them at all, and tell them that asexuals are real, weather they like it or not.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It does make me wonder if JK is actually asexual herself, and feels shame about it. Like how men who claim that “being gay is a choice” often feel that way because they consciously forced themselves to be straight despite their attraction to other men.

  • threeduck@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ll steelman her POV because it seems people are (rightly) confused.

    Asexuals are requesting a day of recognition for what she sees as a negative-identity. Keep in mind, conservatives are often meritocratic.

    It’s like if there were a day for “coffee refrainers”, for everyone who doesn’t like drinking coffee. I’m sure if someone dunked on that day and the coffee refrainers, it’d all be in good spirits.

    But if someone dunked on asexuality, I’m sure it’d cause a lot of upset and defensive argument, which implies more “merit” to asexuality.

    While progressives can go “who cares, just leave em be”, conservatives see all “non-deserved” attention as an affront to meritocracy, that needs to be squashed.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      This actually really helps me understand her perspective. I think she’s wrong of course, and even harmful, but I appreciate the steelman.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Eh. It’s more that you hear a lot about the nuts ones. Number 5 on the richest list is currently a guy named Bernard Arnault, who mostly French people know about, while the infamous Peter Thiel is at 129.

      Same story here. Rowling may or may not have a full billion, but she’s just famous and good at getting rage views like this one.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Irony is that the entire Harry Potter series is like discriminating against people for who they are is wrong.

    • threeduck@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair, I’m pretty sure the slave race of house elves continue being slaves because “they love being slaves”.

      • JillyB@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Didn’t Hermione lead a campaign to liberate house elves but was laughed at by everyone until she dropped it?