• thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s weird. The bluesky links in the article work fine for me, and I don’t have a bluesky account.

    Ahh hang on, this one doesn’t work but all the rest do

    https://bsky.app/profile/megzavala.bsky.social/post/3lmdz2tu6xk2x

    Ahh here we go: it’s a user made setting not a bluesky one

    “Sign-in Required This user has requested that their content only be shown to signed-in users. This label was applied by the author.”

    • SatyrSack@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Ahh here we go: it’s a user made setting not a bluesky one

      “Sign-in Required This user has requested that their content only be shown to signed-in users. This label was applied by the author.”

      Why would a user choose to enable that? Would that make it less likely to be scraped by a bot?

      • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Probably the same person who ends all of their comments on Lemmy with that stupid “anti-AI commercial license” or whatever bullshit.

      • Reisen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        bsky started with nine of its posts. wing shown publicly so when they flopped the switch (i think they also opened registration without invites) some people who had gotten used to their post being hidden from the rest of the net felt exposed and the devs added this settings.

        while i do not think its a great setting i kinda get it. especially given that there are not (yet) private accounts so that’s the best they have