• stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I can’t really get my head around why people dislike Gabe Newell. As best I can tell, he’s been a fantastic steward for Steam.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      You can’t become a billionaire ethically. Steam has a pretty big market for lootboxes and cs skins gambling is pretty widespread.

    • _cryptagion @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Just wait till he dies and the next person in charge decides to go public to make a quick buck. That’ll begin the immediate enshitification of Steam. How many years do we got till he croaks? Ten? Fifteen? Better hope we have a better alternative before then.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        A very typical arc for innovation is that the first organizational goal is getting people to buy it, then the next goal is getting them to keep buying it again and again. The original visionaries who were trying to solve a problem tend to lose interest by then and drop out, and the money weasels completely take over. New versions are released on a marketing schedule regardless of whether they’re necessary, and the thing begins to suck progressively more and more until some new player shows up to solve that problem.

        Rinse and repeat.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’m not going to use something that’s shitty now in hopes it will be better later in order to avoid using something that’s better now out of fear it might become shitty later.

        If Steam becomes shitty I have no issue dropping it and pirating my already paid for collection.

      • festnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        doesnt gabe already do basically nothing though? afaik there are other people managing valve and he only acts as valve’s face

        also theyd have to be extremely stupid to start enshittification when they already have the best ways to monetize games (skins in cs2, hats in tf2, etc)

        im not saying its not possible, im just a very optimistic person

        • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          also theyd have to be extremely stupid to start enshittification when they already have the best ways to monetize games (skins in cs2, hats in tf2, etc)

          Micro$oft also has the most dominant operating system in the market. Yet, with every update, I find an increase in “switched to GNU/Linux” and “Debloat Windows” stuff

          Google once had the best search engine in the world, delivering the most relevant search results. Now it delivers the most relevant ads.

          Mozilla was initially the innovator of the internet, seemingly destined to dominate the market. Then, it abandoned^(†) its main product, the browser, to pursue other endeavors that ultimately failed. The only reason that Firefox is relevantis due to the fact that even when stale, Firefox is much less enshittified than it’s competitors (and not dependent on Chromium).

          ^(†) Mozilla basically stopped innovating with Firefox until recently. On desktop Firefox, vertical tabs are absent; only recently, in nightly versions, have they been implemented. On Android, Firefox still lacks cross-site isolation, which has been in Chromium for basically forever now.
    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      We are on lemmy, a decentralized and open source platform. Steam is closed as much as reddit is.

      Promoting gambling to kids and use the profits to buy multiple mega yachts is peak scum.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      A massive, massive astroturfing campaign Epic Games paid for in hopes of tarnishing Valve and Gabe Newell’s reputation to try and bolster their failure of a shop ecosystem.

      Unfortunately, it worked, because there are people on the net who don’t remember the and days before steam, or even the initial versions of steam that people had Actual problems with, and not just made up ones.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Gabe Newell has a net worth of $9.5 billion and there is no such thing as an ethical billionaire. Steam is great and as long as the company behaves well there’s no reason not to use it, but billionaires are not your friends.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sort of agree but look how much he’s done for Linux gaming. Also the steam deck was well thought out and designed to be user serviceable.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Was that all Gabe? Or was that people at Valve who had the ideas and executed the ideas and Gabe is given credit for?

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            “yes”? He’s definitely not building any significant fraction himself, but if he didn’t care for these things he wouldn’t let the company put so much resources into them.

            Credit for the things built goes to the people building them. Credit for it being possible to build goes to the people who founded and funded the teams

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Sort of agree but look how much he’s done for Linux gaming.

          Let’s not forget that Steam is a proprietary third party launcher that doesn’t share any values with linux. Valve built the apple store of videogames, while they are now moving in a better direction keep in mind that they are part of the problem.

          • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Sort of agree still. Steam deck is a great example. They built it to be user serviceable, and you can literally switch to the Linux desktop and use root, and reinstall your OS if you want. It’s not locked down crazy like other systems. Remember the PS3 other os? Didn’t even get graphics drivers, then they ultimately removed it when it was used to jailbreak it.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        They are some rare cases where someone becomes a billionaire because something suddenly took off.

  • dipcart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Just my two cents but as others have said, not being publically traded helps a lot. The focus on short term benefits that come with shareholders stops “master plans” when they come with mistakes. Learning from relative failures, like the steam controller and the like, ultimately contributes to major successes like the steam deck. Being able to stay committed to improving the software experience over time, instead of killing the product when it didn’t immediately succeed, is fairly rare in the tech industry. And in all honesty, it would be better if they released a polished profuct, but being committed to it made it a success.

    I feel like the pressure to have a majorly successful product day one means that smaller companies can’t innovate the way they want to, so they have to find other ways to produce revenue. Huge companies, like Apple can afford to do both but still stumble, like with the vision pro. Maybe it’ll be a success, but for now its not great and iteration makes it more difficult to maintain the original vision.

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      eh, kinda think strapping a monitor to your face just isn’t the future movies seem to think it should be

  • darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    You’d think it wouldn’t be that hard for publishers with billions of dollars to hire enough competent devs for enough time to make a halfway decent storefront, especially when they don’t even have to reinvent the wheel on a lot of UX and marketing research that’s already been done for them by Steam existing as long as it’s had.

    That none of them have even come close to that is a monument to their incompetence.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Large companies do not generally innovate. Their internal inertia prevents them from successfully creating new things. Also the larger a company gets, the more layers of brainless MBA parasites latch on to suck them dry.

      Large companies rely on purchasing innovation by buying up a never ending stream of smaller companies. They then take the ideas/products and launch them to a wider market.

      Steam has remained small by rejecting massive buyout offers. This has allowed them to remain innovative.

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    His company is working damn hard to make sure you believe they don’t do nothing. All billionares are scum.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m not quite sure they have “done nothing”. They have made a digital storefront that other storefronts strive for, they have help with Linux compatibility with windows only games, have released a few bits of awesome hardware every now and then. I think this is what happens when you are not beholden to shareholders and the mantra “make line go up at all costs”

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    It was the first centralised gaming platform/hub/whatever on PC.

    I remember having to search for matches on the All-Seeing Eye.

    I lost my first Steam account. It would’ve been from September 2003, the same month Steam released. So apparently it would have had some real life value.

    Tried restoring it once, but the email I had had on it was a service that no longer even existed so…

    Anyways practical monopolies make money. Microsoft, Amazon, Google etc.

    Steam isn’t really in any way anti-competitive unlike the other examples, though.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_rent

    • Disco_Dougie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Dang! You got me beat. The account I still use is from 2004, when Half-Life 2 came out. I remember thinking it was bullshit that I had to sign up for something, and connect to the internet to install a physical game I bought.

      Then about five years later, I stayed at my mom’s house for a couple nights, found myself bored, remembered I had my PC in her basement, and set it up. When I discovered that Steam remembered the three games I had, and let me download them (despite losing my HL2 disc years before), my head exploded. It’s wild what it is now and how normalized that is.

  • wizzim@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I have a mixed feeling about Gabe and Valve.

    While I am insanely grateful for proton (even if it was strategically important for them, they didn’t do it out of kindness of heart), some other stuff disturb me:

    • Valve being so lenient on CS2 skin gambling, hurting the young people
    • A steam account being un-inheritable, making you defacto a tenant of your games
    • The 30% percent cut, stealing money from devs
    • Gabe spending his money on multiple mega yachts, like every asshole billionaire, instead of making the world a better place
    • Gabe claiming to be a libertarian, like Elon and other pieces of shit
    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      He hasn’t enshittified anything yet, and it’s looking like he might not ever, which is why people respect him.

      There’s valid criticisms, yes, but that meme is dead accurate. I don’t want to imagine what gaming would look like today if someone like EA the same vast influence over the industry instead of Valve.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Imagine if GabeN created some sort of co-op and left Steam to an employee-run board when he died.

        • DukeHawthorne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s what I was going to say. Sure, Gabe might not be that bad, but what happens to Valve and Steam when he’s gone? Are we just hoping the next guy also isn’t evil?

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      As far as billionaires go, he’s the least shit of the bunch. No idea what his personal life is like, and I don’t want to know. Every billionaire that makes their personal life public so far has turned out to be a giant cunt.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Does nothing? DOES NOTHING?! He spent the last few years ripping Microsoft a new a@@hole, rendering their operating system meaningless for gamers! …but nice meme

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Private company with long-term strategy VS public company chasing short-term profits to pump stock prices for shareholders.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s the primary reason I abhor the stock market. It no longer works for the creator/owner or the customers at all. It simply feeds the greed of the wealthy (special call-out to private equity here).

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah, the flaw there is that money can flow into and out of the stock market basically instantly, so you always have to manage their expectations to make sure your price doesn’t crash.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Idk. With that camera setup I imagine myself on a black leather sofa with a plain white wall behind it.

    Gabe , what kind of movie are we making? Gaben?