• Legoraft@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    To be fair, also love the mini pc’s and having a larger NAS. For me the PoE capabilities of the Pi’s are definitely the reason I use them

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Ha ha

    Under-complicated -> over-complicated -> under-complicated.

    There’s a ‘just right’ that I think you skipped through.

  • abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I need a kubernetes cluster with high availability, load balancing and horizontal pod autoscaling, because that is something I want to learn. I don’t care that it’s just for wife’s home-made dog collars webshop.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I don’t get this; a Pi isn’t even in the same conversation as an old rackmount server you can get for free. You couldn’t stuff half the compute, ram and storage into a Pi or a dozen Pis for 10X the cost of grabbing something off eBay for a hundred bucks.

        That’s if the Rpi Foundation is deigning to let us peasants even buy them these days.

        • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          The problem is that server will probably use more electricity, it’ll be clunky to store, and it’s going to be loud as fuck.

        • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I have an old rackmount server I got for free. Dual Xeon X5650s, 192GB of RAM, four 8TB HDDs, and a pair of 250GB SSDs. I can only use it in the basement because it’s too loud to run anywhere else, but even then, it’s currently off because it trips its circuit breaker under heavy load.

          A power strip full of Pis in a k3s cluster doesn’t do that. I used a 2GB model 4 for the control plane and 3Bs as the workers.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Yeah that’s basically it for me. I have a collection of dev boards, old hardware and stuff other people were tossing out set up for a variety of purposes (Kubernetes clusters, two build farms, network boot, etc.). None of it is because I feel I “need” any of that for self hosting. In practice two old desktops with a bunch of drives would be perfectly capable of providing everything I need including redundancy. I have all that stuff because I’m learning and experimenting.

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Wait, you can host a website on a raspberry pi !? But is it really cheaper than shared hosting, for instance? And even then, quality-wise, it cannot be that good, can it?

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      You can definitely run a low traffic website with a Pi. You can run Minecraft Servers and such on Pis. Especially on Pi4s.

    • Quokka@mastodon.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      @MrMobius @hanke depends what you’re doing. A Raspberry Pi can be surprisingly powerful. Can run NAS, websites, proxies, things like NextCloud, PiHole.
      Cheaper than paying someone for hosting a small server? Maybe. But there’s pros and cons of both.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      You can host a website on a lot less, even. But it entirely depends on what you’re hosting and the load. Basically anything can host a bunch of static pages, so if your site is just that, basically anything will do. You could probably even do a WordPress site with the right caching plugins and serve a reasonable amount of traffic. The first limit you’ll hit realistically is your uplink, not your webserver CPU.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Same as a 4x CPU with 8GB ram VPS.
      Unless bandwidth is a limiting factor.
      But the quality of a website is about code. Not about hardware

  • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I’ve been enjoying Jeff Geerling’s ongoing experiments with his 10" Raspberry Pi mini rack.

    It doesn’t work for me since all of my network equipment is 19" and there’s no point in having two racks but having a 10" standard is still a great idea!

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Docker is so bad. I don’t think a lot of you young bloods understand that. The system is so incredibly fragmented. Tools like Portainer are great, but they’re a super pain in the ass to use with tools/software that include a dockerfile vs a compose file. There’s no interoperability between the two which makes it insurmountably time-consuming and stupid to deal with certain projects because they’re made for a specific build environment which is just antithetical to good computing.

        Like right now, I have Portainer up. I want to test out Coolify. I check out templates? Damn, not there. Now I gotta add my own template manually. Ok, cool. Half way done. Oops. It expects a docker-compose.yml. The Coolify repository only has a Dockerfile. Damn, now I have to make a custom template. Oh well, not a big deal. Plop in the Dockerfile from the repository, and click “deploy.” OOPS! ERROR: “failed to deploy a stack: service “soketi” has neither an image nor a build context specified: invalid compose project.” Well fuck… Ok, whatever. Not the biggest of deals. Let me search for an image of “soketi” using dockerhub. Well fuck. There are 3 images which haven’t been updated in several years. Awesome. Which one do I need? The echo-server? The network-watcher? PWS?

        Like, do you see the issue here? There’s nothing about docker that’s straightforward at all. It fails in so many aspects it’s insane that its so popular.

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Maybe I’m an idiot (high possibility) but I couldn’t even get the instance of homebridge docker to work. However, it had zero problems running on hypervisor. You aren’t alone.

          • Xanza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            I’m coming to appreciate Hyper-V more and more to be honest. It’s a very mature virtualization environment. The only issue I have with it is the inability to do GPU-passthrough. Once they figure that one out, I probably won’t bother with anything else.

  • thecoolowl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    The HAT-ability of RPi makes them enough for me. You can add sata ports, PCIe, and more with a simple HAT.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Raspberry Pis are way overhyped and overpriced.

    Also this is totally wrong. Once you start it just keeps growing unless there is some other factor.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Yes, you can optimize a lot. Especially with Linux. I did the same and even started to replace program that did too much, bloated, with my own programs. To speed up the development I did it with AI and Cursor.