• dx1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sanctions not going through Congress, it’s insane that’s considered constitutional

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      He governs by decrees basically, and so did biden. Its mental gymnastics at olympic level to call the US a democratic country.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If they won’t take them, maybe we could put all these Columbians in some sort of District. A District of Columbia filled with criminals. Wait, we already have that.

  • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe the US should take back the US members of ISIS that have been left (along with the people from the other nations that joined ISIS) for the Kurds to keep.

    • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well you see, we have long and storied history of fucking over the Kurds. You wouldn’t want to tarnish that record would you?

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    To be clear, Colombia already backed down and accepted all the demands. Which is unfortunate but not surprising. Starting to get “Just give Hitler what he wants and he’ll stop” vibes. Surprised folks didn’t learn their lesson…

    • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of these actually are criminals why should we have to keep them?

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s really simple if you have a basic, or very tiny, ability to think about it for two seconds. Let’s see if I can help. Criminals being deported are a huge problem for any receiving county, you see, they often don’t have any legal pretext to imprison or arrest them, if they committed crimes in anther nation, it’s unlikely the can collect evidence, or call witnesses to a legal process, also, it’s quite rare to have laws that apply to actions that occurred outside all legaly boundaries. It’s it illegal if an American goes to a county they don’t have documentation to be in, then commit crimes outside the US against other people without any way for the US to detect or prove these actions? So if Colombia has an American who kills dozens of people in their country, and is charged and sentanced to life without parole, and then the decide YEARS after the fact to put them on a plane to LAX and throw them off the plane with no other effort, do you want to let that plane land? That’s fucking insane. The solution to this problem already exists. Instead of being a fascist stupid fuck, you can create an extradition process where we can accept the Colombian legal process and transfer them ourselves to a US prison without dumping serial killers at an airport on their own.

        Being a threatening authoritarian isn’t solving this problem, and thinking every country in the world will simply accept people who have been convicted an sentanced in another nation is fucking stupid. And thinking they can manage to exist outside US economic good will it’s also stupid. If he think burning every ally in Latin America is going to hurt them more than us, he’s as dumb asv everyone already knows.

      • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ah yes, because criminals are subhumans who should be exterminated like the cockroaches they are. And if we can’t take the trash out back like we should we can at least make it not our problem and make sure the cockroaches aren’t in our backyard. That’s what you’re saying right?

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, why shouldn’t we send all Republicans to another country? Or how about those criminals guilty of being Jewish, or black, or gay? Or how about the crime of “looking too Mexican,” like the US did to US citizens during Operations Wetback 1 & 2.

        Also, love how you even say “some of them are criminals,” not all of them. Meaning that you’re okay with gathering up some amount of innocent people and sending them to a different country with nothing more than the clothes on their backs.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          And let’s get this clear, sending someone back to their “home” country without a plan or an actual home to go to should be a criminal act. These people are often productive members of US society who pay more taxes than Aotus. They already have homes and family in the US.

          This is beyond despicable and crosses into the the realm of pure evil.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because we’re not entitled to force some other country to take them!

        WTF did you think the answer was‽

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Basically nobody opposes deporting actual criminals (not political crimes). The problem is that it isn’t the cartel members and bank robbers who get rounded up when a factory is raided. And the mother fleeing persecution is treated the same as the drug kingpin.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Basically nobody opposes deporting actual criminals

          Deportation as a mechanism of punishment for state and federal crimes is generally bad policy. It is excessively draconian (it effectively renders them homeless, unemployed, and indefinitely denied their family and friends for… what? Too many parking tickets? Working construction without a license? Illegally camping?) for some. And entirely too lenient (deporting hardened criminals and cartel leaders like serial rapists or murderers effectively guarantees their release in states that can’t afford to jail them) for others.

          That’s why we’ll often extradite gang leaders into the US from overseas, when the crimes are severe enough. Its also why “sanctuary cities” regularly look the other way for petty offenses in order to avoid the mass economic disruption of ICE interference in municipal matters.

          Injecting immigration penalties into the civil justice system fucks with all the basic functions of local courts and prosecutors. It raises the stakes on minor offenses and gives the worst offenders a get-out-of-jail-free card.

          All that is assuming you even have somewhere to send undocumented criminals. For people who are functionally stateless - migrants who came over as children without papers, refugees from countries that cannot repatriate them or effectively no longer exist, Native Americans who the Feds don’t want to recognize as legal US residents - the ability to deport is little more than Penal Transportation. Nevermind how it routinely violates the 5th and 8th amendment, it mostly just means bribing a small, bankrupt satrap of the US to accept planeloads of random people, often without so much as a proper conviction.

          • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            it effectively renders them homeless, unemployed, and indefinitely denied their family and friends for… what? Too many parking tickets? Working construction without a license? Illegally camping?

            the u, s and a are actually deporting people over misdemeanors?

        • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re asssuming they got mothers on this specific flight? I’ve seen nothing about innocents in this flight being posted, are these not straight up criminals on this flight? Can you show me articles I cant find any

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We don’t actually know what is going on. We had a system that favored protections for people presumed innocent until proven guilty.

        Now Trump is moving so fast with a process that is not transparent and a rhetoric that is hostile and unsympathetic towards all immigrants. People are understandably suspicious that the immigrants were given a fair chance to defend their legal presence in the USA.

        Shit, I won’t be surprised when legal us born citizens get deported in a mix up.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Shit, I won’t be surprised when legal us born citizens get deported in a mix up.

          They’re already rounding up native Americans in these groups. It’s only a matter of time until they start deporting randomly to other countries because ICE was already an incompetent organization and has done that previously numerous times, speeding things up just means more fuckups. Which is of course, the plan. Because it’s not about illegals, or immigrants, it’s about non-whites.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Stop using that label as an excuse to treat people as subhuman.

        The state is rounding up people en masse and shipping them off to a foreign country. This process took a week. Due process is not present. This is some straight-up Nazi shit, and if you can’t at least mutter “fuck that,” then please shut up.

  • Thoven@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even after all these years, I physically cringe every time I read “ReTruths”

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ho ho ho. Trump does not hold the cards here. Colombia DNGAF. But Trump does, and he’s digging that hole as fast as he can.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ironically, so does your comment. You mean actively and forcibly ejecting refugees.

      The economic vs. refugee character of the people he ejected is unclear AFIAK, though.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Oh, negative morally.

          How does it do that? These were Colombian citizens being moved unwillingly, not refugees.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Saying the president is already unpopular and now he won’t take these people makes it sound like taking refugees would boost his popularity

            Trump however by doing this shows he thinks taking refugees is a bad thing

            Forcibly relocating refugees doesn’t make them no longer refugees, it just makes you (the one relocating them) a bad person/in violation of international law

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump wouldn’t recognize hypocrisy if it walked up and kicked him in the balls.

      • dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Norman Finkelstein said something the other day, quoting someone else…it was…“hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue”. Meaning, evil people understand what they’re doing is wrong, that’s why they pretend to be good. Hypocrisy is beyond the point to them. They’ve sacrificed morality. Although I think Finkelstein was saying it in the context of talking about how Republican pols do so much less of even pretending to be good (though certainly not zero).

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t think Finkelstein’s quote takes into account a severe narcissist.

          In the narcissistic mind, the only right is something that benefits them, and the only wrong is something that harms them.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It would be a good idea that Mexico, Columbia and other latin countries promote the Trump Wall, but expelling all US residents in their countries. A wall always works in both directions.