• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fighting trolls should not be done by invalidating neopronouns, speak to anyone that uses neopronouns and they’ll likely tell you that it quickly cascades into witch hunting.

            • davel@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s just basic maffs, Cowbee:

              1. Any given opinion can only be held by one person in the universe.
              2. Admin Ada @ blahaj and you have the same opinion regarding neopronouns.
              3. Therefore you and Ada incontrovertibly must be the same person.
        • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not sure I agree as it seems like black and white thinking.

          I.e. I could imagine a scenario where someone is very obviously/admits to using neopronouns disingenuously and that would break my social contract with them to honour it.

          If I make an assessment of neopronoun usage on a case by case basis I can still avoid witch hunts. It’s similar to how I determine in real life if someone is an asshole or not.

          Another way; I can support a person who I genuinely believe uses neopronouns while denouncing and excluding someone who doesn’t.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is a very tricky slope. It’s best to never compromise on neopronoun usage even with suspected trolls, they can be discredited without erasing the pronouns.