After reading about the “suicide” of yet another whistleblower, it got me thinking.

When working at large enough company, it’s entirely possible that at some point you will get across some information the company does not want to be made public, but your ethics mandate you blow the whistle. So, I was wondering if I were in that position how I would approach creating a dead man’s switch in order to protect myself.

From wikipedia:

A dead man’s switch is a switch that is designed to be activated or deactivated if the human operator becomes incapacitated, such as through death, loss of consciousness, or being bodily removed from control. Originally applied to switches on a vehicle or machine, it has since come to be used to describe other intangible uses, as in computer software.

In this context, a dead man’s switch would trigger the release of information. Some additional requirements could include:

  1. No single point of failure. (aka a usb can be stolen, your family can be killed, etc)
  2. Make the existence of the switch public. (aka make sure people know of your mutually assured destruction)
  3. Secrets should be safe until you die, disappear, or otherwise choose to make them public.

Anyway, how would you go about it?

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The most non-intrusive foolproof method I can think of is spite-induced action:

    1. Get a pacemaker with Zigbee mesh network connectivity
    2. Implant a small device into your wrist that vibrates if your pacemaker is ever disconnected from the network (in which case, run NOW to your nearest safehouse)
    3. Should the vibration continue for longer than 5 minutes, a vial of cyanide from a hollow tooth explodes into your mouth allowing you to spit it at your nearest enemy (should one be around)
    4. The bursting of the hollow tooth sends a signal to a remote server, which triggers the eject command on a server, causing the CD tray to come out.
    5. A confused sysadmin will bitterly get off his chair, and go inspect the server, whereupon he will see the paper instructions embedded in the CD tray, and read them.
    6. Assuming his latvian is good, and that he’s familiar with caesar cyphers, he will decode the message that will lead him to a youtube URL where he will post the following comment “Jose I slept with your mother.”
    7. One of the subscribers to the youtube channel is your friend Jose, who will read the comment, spit out his coffee, and then immediately call you.
    8. After about a week of no response, he uploads the contents of that USB stick you gave him with the instructions to “never upload this ever under any circumstance” out of sheer spite.

    Edit: Here, I made a diagram of the whole thing

    State Diagram

    (with mermaid source)
    stateDiagram-v2
        direction TB
        
        state Internet {
            state "Wider Zigbee Network" as WiderZigbeeNetwork
            --
            state "Youtube" as youtube{
                state "MuckBang
                <small>Wasabi Challenge</small>" as video1
                state "A Cat's Guide to Vomit
                <small>By Remington Steel</small>" as video2
            }        
            state "Remote Server" as server {
                state "Server
                <small>CD-Tray</small>" as cdtray
                state "SysAdmin
                <small>Some Latvian Dude</small>" as terry
            }
            --
            state "brazzers.org" as brazzers
        }
    
        state People {
            state "Jose" as jose {
               state "Youtube Subscriptions" as subs
                state "Phone" as josephone
                state "Coffee" as cuppajoe
                state "USB Stick" as usb2
            }
            state "You" as you {
                state "Pacemaker" as pmaker
                state "Wrist Implant" as wrimplant
                state "Hollow Tooth" as htooth
                state "USB Stick" as usb1
                state "Phone" as youphone
            }
            state "Enemy" as enemy {
                state "Random Person" as rando
            }
        }
    
        [*] --> pmaker : Insert next to heart
        pmaker --> WiderZigbeeNetwork : Maintain connection
        WiderZigbeeNetwork --> wrimplant : Vibrate for 5 mins if connection lost
        wrimplant --> htooth: Explode after 5 mins vibrating
    
        htooth --> cdtray: Send "eject"
        htooth --> enemy: Spit cyanide
        cdtray --> terry : Decode the paper in the CD tray
        terry --> video1 : Comment about Jose's mother
    
        video1 --> subs : subscribed to
        video2 --> subs : subscribed to
    
        subs --> cuppajoe : Spit out when reading insulting comment
        cuppajoe --> usb2
        cuppajoe --> josephone
    
        usb1 --> usb2 : Years ago - Give USB stick with instructions to never upload
        josephone --> youphone : Call to complain but get no response
        usb2 --> brazzers : Upload USB contents out of spite
    
    
  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    5 days ago

    The real answer: hire a law firm, entrust them with your documents, write into your will what you want to happen with them, and then go on about your business.

    • souperk@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 days ago

      Maybe, add a clause what should happen if you disappear for more than x days. For most jurisdictions you are considered dead if you disappear for a few years.

    • acidred@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The question assumes that you family could be killed. Why the law firm is protected against such violence in that case?

      • Object@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        A dead man’s switch doesn’t quite protect you from garden hose cryptanalysis though. Nothing stops them from asking you to tell them if he got a dead man’s switch.

    • Anonymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is only partially true in the situation the poster named. What if your secrets are from the government or governmental organization? What if you live under a repressive regime where the law firms are either corrupt or that the law is not in your favor?

      That being said, I have a will and a bank safe deposit box. It is filed with the state that I have a will and the will is (also) in the safe deposit box along with stuff that I’d prefer not be released until my death. There’s also a clause in the will that says something to the effect that if somebody sues to invalidate the will, they are automatically excluded from any benefit (or responsibilities). Also, if an individual is found to be somehow responsible or had an intentional involvement in my death, then they are also excluded.

      It’s not air tight, but works for my needs. By the way, I don’t have any company or government secrets, it’s just normal family drama, so please don’t kill me.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Set up several solar powered raspberry pies with cheap iot SIM cards, each will check a vm in the cloud or at home for a key. If the key isn’t present or can’t be reached they release the info. Could have several servers to store keys to check. Everyday you enter a code to prevent the key from being removed.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      You would need to account for temporary connection issues to make sure it doesn’t send it after a network outage or something.

  • Aa!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    There are very few situations where a dead man’s switch would have helped these whistleblowers.

    Once they have gone public and are at risk of being “suicided” they should have already released everything they knew. Sitting on it after already going public in any way only helps if the goal is to blackmail or extort the company, rather than to expose the company or protect others.

    A lot of people have latched onto the idea of a dead man’s switch (and I get it, technical solutions are fun to create), but the only part of the scenario it would help is before the whistleblower goes public, while they are still gathering information and haven’t yet been discovered by the company. Even then, it wouldn’t protect them from being killed, it would only ensure that the partial work is released in case they were discovered and prevented from finishing it.

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you really have secrets, you shouldn’t have a dead man’s switch.

    You should have released it all on day one.

    “What makes them keep you alive then?”

    It’s not like corporations are going to get punished for killing you regardless.

    • notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 days ago

      The problem with releasing them on day one is that you then can’t gather more. If you’ve only just exposed the edges of the malfeasance you need time to get the rest before exposing it. Go too early and the rest of the evidence can be destroyed, covered up or those holding it coearsed into silence.

      Having a dead man’s switch is a way to ensure whatever you’ve gathered gets released if you’re no longer in a position to gather more. As such I disagree with the poster about making it public knowledge before release. Keep it secret until you have everything, then release it.

    • souperk@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      Another thing to consider is that you won’t know immediately that the information you stumbles upon is incriminating. Sometimes it may take years until you have all the pieces of the puzzle.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Fwiw I’ve actually thought about a dead man’s switch for a while now. When my partner and I were going through end-of-life stuff, having the ability to delete or open things as needed after you’re dead can be important.

        I have a rough design in my head where you register various monitors (e.g. checking email, logging into Lemmy, etc) and so long as you reach a specified threshold you’re considered alive.

        Build in a duress code or dead code that can be entered by your next of kin, then you got something workable.

        For a dead drop like you described in your OP, I agree that instructions to an attorney is probably your best bet. But in the scenario you’re describing, it sounds like having this code won’t be valuable.

  • shastaxc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    The whole point in being a whistleblower is to release the documents. Why would you tell everyone what’s happening and not provide the evidence? After you release it, there’s less chance of being harmed, and your job is done besides showing up to court.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Maybe he wants to release a censored version of the documents and have the dead man switch release the uncensored version.

    • souperk@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nothing atm, but you never know what you may find. I would assume that most whistleblowers didn’t know they joined a shady organisation until years down the line…

  • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Pretty easy if you don’t work for google.

    1. Upload everything to a google drive.
    2. setup inactive account manager
    3. add all the news agencies you can get a hold of, government offices, police etc.
    4. make sure it’s read only access.

    If they want to silence you they have to 1. Know about your account. 2. Keep it active.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It relies on the news agencies and such actually caring.

      As someone who’s been fighting a huge fight against a casino threatening my performance home, lemme tell you that most don’t give a single shit

  • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Depends on your background and industry.

    If you work in IT, and are technically adept, you can…

    1. Store said files on a proton drive or mega.nz drive set to be only accessible to read by those who have the unique URL.
    2. Create a small server with a cron job that every 24 hours sends you a text message to a Google Voice number accessible anywhere with internet connectivity and you have 60 seconds to reply otherwise the cron job will craft a premade email to all international news agencies as well as government agencies responsible for the control of this issue, along with links to download the information.
    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      60 seconds in 24 hours seems too prone to the possibility of a false positive. What if you forget and take a nap? What if there’s a power outage? What if your phone breaks unexpectedly?

      • All good points, however the purpose of a deadman’s switch is that you fear for your life, taking a nap might not be as easy under those circumstances. Also, if you know at what time the SMS is set to arrive you can plan ahead to make sure you have Internet in order to respond, but OK maybe 60 seconds is too short of a time so let’s make it 5 minutes. Being that this is using Google Voice, you can receive the SMS over a tablet or laptop so a backup would be a must have.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    A whistleblower doesn’t need a dead man’s switch as they’d just release the document.

    A muckracker does.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You may not be able to collect more if you publish everything at the start

    • red@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think its useful for situation where I’m in process of collecting evidence, so I can keep tge switch just in case I get caught in the process but at least the evidence so far can be public

    • atan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      A whistleblower is likely to have access to sensitive data or other forms of leverage not directly linked to whatever they’re whistleblowing on. Of course this sort of insurance policy would be useful to them.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Give the encrypted file to one person, the key to another and do not keep either yourself. They exchange them if you die.

    • souperk@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      Why not keep a copy?

      Also, both people are single point of failures. Maybe, 5-6 people where each has an encrypted payload and the keys to decrypt everyone else’s payload.

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        IIRC Julian Assange had something like that set up. There used to be a file you could download from WikiLeaks that was encrypted and supposedly contained something very spicy, and if anything happened to him the password would be released somehow.

        No idea if that’s still a thing or not though.

  • Object@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The hardest part would be how to trigger the kill-switch periodically without showing it to your adversary whilst keeping it easy. Having your device queried directly would be a dead giveaway. My idea without involving people would be as follows:

    1. Set up a program that syncs files to a remote third-party cloud
    2. Sync it to a directory that frequently changes when you use your device (your docs, for example)
    3. Have a server that queries the third-party drive for that synchronised directory
    4. If there are no changes, trigget the alarm

    But since this plan relies on the secrecy, it’s kind of ruined now. That, and I think your threat model is a bit too extreme.

  • Lurker123 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    One issue from a legal/prosecutorial point of view (even assuming there is a willingness for the government to prosecute) is that the rules of evidence require authentication of documents. In the case of a whistleblower, they are themselves a witness and can authenticate (that is, attest to the genuine nature of) any supporting documents they bring in. If a whistleblower is killed, even if the government has the documents the whistleblower intended to authenticate, it becomes a lot trickier to use.