• theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yeah, so the thing is, any amount of trust that I had has already been completely destroyed. “We don’t do it anymore because it’s illegal, trust me bro” isn’t going to cut it. Does the bill include mandatory prison time for executives for violations, or just cost-of-doing-business fines? Will this be enforced by a government regulatory body that is not literally outnumbered 20:1 by car manufacturer lawyers?

    If the car has any kind of network capabilities and 100% of the car’s software is not open source, I’m not buying it. Period.

    This bill would not need to exist if cars were FOSS, or if cars were non-networked. Those are the only 2 solutions that I will accept. This bill is worthless to me.

    • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I agree with you, the damage has been done. That’s why I’m looking at alternative methods of transportation, like an ebike or public transit. Hopefully your area has good infrastructure for that.

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s nice to have principles, but in a few years you’re going to have to find a new way to get around.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I mean, a lot of cars have a genuinely phenomenal life span, if you don’t mind getting something that isn’t shiny and new you can probably get like a 2012 Toyota or Honda and drive it till the wheels fall off. My dream car is from the 90s and people still generally regard them as fairly reliable

        Eventually it’ll be an issue, but that does leave a lot of time for nerds and hackers to find a way to gut networking stuff while telling the car it’s still intact. Dunno if we’ll ever see an open source car OS compatible with the systems in major manufacturer’s vehicles, but privacy workarounds feel like they could be pretty realistic

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          My dream car is from the 90s and people still generally regard them as fairly reliable

          I would not want to share the road with modern oversized cars while driving a car with 90s crash safety

          I drive a Miata as a 2nd car for weekend fun, but it’s not a real option as a daily driver if you value your life

          Not to mention that it uses 8 liters of gas per 100km, whilst my daily driver averages 12wkh per 100km

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Thats fair. A na miata is basically my dream car, I hope to someday daily one in spite of being from the 90s 😅

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Lol cars last more than “a few years”, my current vehicle is 20 years old. I’ll easily get another 150,000 miles out of it, probably more. I already have a crate motor picked out to swap in when the engine finally dies. Or I could just “upgrade” to a newer year and still be non-networked.

        Now I’m being a little silly, but at this rate of climate change acceleration, I’m starting to bet that my current vehicle is going to outlive capitalism anyway.

    • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I didn’t read too far, but,

      To restrict car manufacturers and other companies from selling consumer car-related data, increase transparency regarding data practices, and for other purposes.

      already skips over collecting the data, so yeah. I would guess this bill just exists for the optics, and isn’t actually intended to challenge the industry.