• arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This article is over a decade old. That was his first election. There have been several elections since, and he’s had the ability to rule by decree for basically a decade now.

      • canihasaccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I did some searching because I don’t trust the US’s word and figured I’d find the opposite. However, I found this, which seems to be a pretty good source?

        https://muse.jhu.edu/article/947882

        I don’t think any country should remove another country’s president under any circumstances, though.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Johns Hopkins University Press

          You’d be hard pressed to find more extreme US propaganda sources. The way they start off their article gives it all away already.

      • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t care enough about this discussion, so no. I’m just pointing out that the article is basically useless since it’s from the election that was the least likely to be influenced and was also quite a while ago.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          So people can just throw out claims without evidence and when they get debunked they get to make the same claim over and over again?

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            They didn’t make the initial claims, they were just pointing out that your source was questionably relevant given it’s age. Nobody has re-presented any debunked claims here.

          • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            sigh

            No, the conditions are just not the same. Chavez was actually popular, whereas Maduro’s rule has been marked by civil unrest for a number of reasons, but one of the main is the absurd inflation rate. Some of these problems were inherited and just got way worse when he took power, but he hasn’t fixed them, so that he keeps winning elections is more than a little suspicious.

              • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                And? Are you saying most people are gonna keep voting for the status quo in such a situation just to stick it to the US? Is it somehow justified if a ruling government rigs elections or something similar simply because they are in opposition to the US government? You realize the world isn’t just black and white, right?

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Venezuela is among the top countries for economic growth in the last year. They aren’t without problems, but Maduro was doing well.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s no evidence that he stole the last election either, he’s a popularly supported left wing president that the working classes love. The compradors and fascists like Machado and Guaido that the US Empire continues to support are very unpopular. The US Empire is trying to do the same thing they did when Trump claimed 2020 was stolen.