In general, the report found that the AI summaries showed “a limited ability to analyze and summarize complex content requiring a deep understanding of context, subtle nuances, or implicit meaning.” Even worse, the Llama summaries often “generated text that was grammatically correct, but on occasion factually inaccurate,”

how is this being accepted? one would have to go through any output with a fine-toothed comb anyway to weed out ai hallucinations, as well as to preserve nuance and context.

it’s like the ai tells you that mona lisa has three eyes and a nose and her mouth is closed but her denim jacket is open. you’re going to report that in your story without ever looking at the painting?

do look up the “forer effect” and then read that ai summary again.

maybe that’s just the ai’s internal monologue leaking through?

man they are taking that keeping a doctor business really seriously, no?

if you believe that ai summary, i have a bridge that i’d like to sell to you.

or, alternatively, their lifetime offer has truly been honoured.