• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 8th, 2025

help-circle



  • Hey man, I wasn’t trying to be a jerk, I was trying to make a joke. Sorry if it came off badly, probably not my best phrasing. I guess there’s a joke to be made about my jokes in there somewhere.

    Truth be told, I’m salty about proton, not necessarily about what the ceo said (that too), but its like a canary in the mine, isn’t it, a portent of things to come. So many companies are bending the knee, ufortunately.

    I used to pay for proton becase it saved me time and piece of mind, now since I left I have to self-host everything, because I no longer want to move my shit around every time something goes the way of enshittification. That means time and effort spent on setting up and maintaining everything. Its a chore.

    Thats why I made the joke the way I did, because I’m salty, I didn’t cook it proper. You have a good one and take care out there stranger.






  • This is such a superficial take.

    Flatpaks have their use-case. Alpine has its use-case as a small footprint distro, focused on security. Using flatpaks would nuke that ethos.

    Furthermore, they need those servers to build their core and base system packages. There is no distro out there that uses flatpaks or appimages for their CORE.

    Any distro needs to build their toolchain, libs and core. Flatpaks are irrelevant to this discussion.

    At the risk of repteating myself, flatpaks are irrelevant to Alpine because its a small footprint distro, used alot in container base images, containers use their own packaging!

    Furthermore, flatpaks are literal bloat, compared to alpines’ apk packages which focus on security and minimalism.

    Edit: Flatpak literally uses alpine to build its packages. No alpine, no flatpaks. Period

    Flatpaks have their use. This is not that. Check your ignorance.