This used to happen when new subs opened. Most of my feed was just them.
My assumption was that as the sub grew the posts kept getting voted higher than any other on the sub and therefore pushed as top material relative to the subs normal amount of up votes.
Actually jit languages can outperform compiled languages by using runtime analysis to perform tiered compilation and profile guided optimisations.
C# has made some great strides in this regard.
All the normal optimisations are applied when it is compiled to byte code. Like loop unrolling etc.
Then once it detects the hot paths during execution it can apply even more based on how it is called. It can also do optimisations that aren’t possible at initial compile time.
Dynamic PGO it’s called. It’s a really interesting topic.
This is definitely the answer. Bonus points for contextless clues to getting the other half.
I’m fairly sure use after free isn’t possible unless you explicitly use unsafe code right?
It’s compiler enforced is the point.
That sounds like a comment written by somebody who has no idea what the article says
2.6% increase in thread ops when copying data from user space seems pretty significant.
I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.
Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.
You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.
Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.
You just aren’t the target audience.
This one is relatively as well.
It’s amazingly good at moderating user content to flag for moderator review. Existing text analysis completely falls down beyond keyword filtering tbh.
It’s really good at sentiment analysis. Which is great for things like user reviews. The Amazon ai notes on products are actually brilliant at summarizing the pros and cons of a product. I work for a holiday let company and we experimented with using it to find customers we need to follow up with and the results were amazing.
It smashes other automated translating services as well.
I use it a lot as a programmer to very quickly learn new topics. Also as an interactive docs that you can ask follow up questions to. I can pick up a new language as I go much faster than with traditional resources.
It’s honestly a complete game changer.
I’m guessing they have limited resources for direct intervention so use this to flag up people who have the most risk factors.
It doesn’t sound like this is people asking for help but more trying to predict who might need it.
after an investigation by The Fuller Project and The Markup found the department’s algorithm prioritized White, male veterans. It also gave preference to veterans who are “divorced and male” and “widowed and male” but not to any group of female veterans.
It shouldn’t favour anyone. It should treat each person as an individual and figure out what they need based on their characteristics. If it’s been designed to only work well for white men it’s been designed poorly.
As a type 1 diabetic with multiple attachments already this sounds great.
Honestly I would just commit your in progress work then on the other machine check it out and reset to the previous commit.
Then you have your in progress work on the new machine with no random commits.
You could set up an alias that does commit with message “switching machines” and pushes.
Similar have one that pulls and resets.
Holy crap lol this response made OPs edit the most incorrect thing I’ve ever seen.
“ChatGpt is really good if you use it properly”
Gets torrents of down votes every time. But I literally use it a lot at work and it’s brilliant.