They are hiring them to handle the disposition of unneeded tokens of currency. I don’t see how that violates the prime directive…
They are hiring them to handle the disposition of unneeded tokens of currency. I don’t see how that violates the prime directive…
I think you have realized that every comment here was about your decision not to use Git. I don’t think there is much more to say about this…
You don’t have to. Absolutely not.
But: As a potential user it provides some additional features your solution lacks. I can easily fork or clone your repo and change things if I need to. If I think it benefits the project I can easily offer these changes back to you, if I don’t I can still profit from future development on your side and incorporate my changes into it. I can very easily check what has changed between two versions without relying (trusting) your changelogs or performing a manual diff.
But most importantly it is a matter of trust. Not so much trust in your intentions and the possibility of malicious code (Git won’t prevent that), but it obfuscates your code unnecessarily making it harder to continue if you at some point decide to stop maintaining it or even detect vulnerabilities as it is not easily accessible without knowing where to look for it.
I like the idea, but may I ask why you don’t use a version control system like Git (or anything else that fits your needs)?
I can see what Jadzia liked about them…