You need to set another @ in front of the username to tag them properly. For example: @splendoruranium@infosec.pub

Besides that: this is especially funny/weird given OP’s two posts in !fuck_ai@lemmy.world. [1], [2]

🎉WOOP🎉WOOP🎉

Why is this still a thing?

But China wants to undermine Europe’s security. China wants to have a weak Europe.

Does Vegas already have odds which, how many and for how long France’s nuclear power plants have to shut down?

up to being the keyword here.

Every day, the US strays further towards the Third Reich. This is painful to watch and a stark reminder to keep fighting at home (I’m not from the US).

I’m not american, but from my experience with american media (including queer content creators on YT etc) I’d say it depends on context and pronunciation.

In the context you provided, spoken angrily, I’d guess it’s an insult and I have heard it like that, but it is also used in a celebratory, uplifting, empowering way.

In a joint statement, the store’s trustees said: "The bookshop is an inclusive organisation that wants to share the Christian faith with everyone and we do not want to advocate or condemn anyone on the basis of their belief or sexual orientation.

"As a Christian bookshop we would have been delighted to have flown the Derbyshire flag, the flag of St George or the union flag.

“Unfortunately, due to lack of initial consultation on the matter, we had to decline to fly the flag allocated to our shop, as a matter of conscience and in keeping with our faith and scriptures.”

So you they would’ve been fine with any other flag, just not a Pride flag. Yea, sounds pretty inclusive to me (/s, obviously). Fucking bigots. I wish I could be there with some crayons and stuff.

Judged by the other voices in the article, seems to be a nice town though.

They’re lazy. They don’t want to think about “all that computer stuff”.

They won’t answer.

I set up meetings through Zoom and BBB before where you can join without an account and through a web interface. Usually, the answer was: „Sorry, we’re using Teams, please set up a Teams call or we won’t be able to have the meeting.“
Any attempt to explain was just waisted energy.

For one stupid reason: everybody else uses it.

it’s just bigger for the sake of being bigger

Not true for every car. Small cars get bigger, too, but because nowadays there are way more safety features built in. Side impact protection needs space, too, for example. Also, especially smaller cars get more roomy and comfortable, too (except the Twingo, for some reason).
That being said: fuck SUVs and trucks. They’re much bigger than they need to be and just status symbols.

Fuck SAP though. All my homies hate SAP anyway.

Poor doggos…

Working class people rarely can afford new cars anyway and this ban targets initial registrations, not the already existing market of second hand cars.

Those old cars will not be hit by the ban though. It’s only about new cars and initial registrations. Calling this generally an ICE ban is masterful lobby propaganda.

A legal definition has changed (improved and corrected, you could say).

No, just defined differently de jure. Before, you had to explicitly disagree for it to be nonconsensual, now you have to explicitly agree for it to be consensual. It went from opt-out to opt-in practice, if you will. Consent was regarded to be implicit, if you did not make it clear you didn’t consent.