Those aren’t build logs. Those are “I took an open source software package and put commercial hardware around it.”
Which is fine, since it’s MIT software (and why I push for GPL, personally). What’s not fine is a creator calling their commercial product “open” or “DIY” without a BOM or build log.
I would revise the post title regardless of what the author calls it, personally.
I’ll find it after Christmas. I got a fork a bit ago when looking at the code.
I think its based on https://github.com/atomic14/diy-esp32-epub-reader
Build logs: https://hackaday.io/project/204323-diptyx-e-reader
Those aren’t build logs. Those are “I took an open source software package and put commercial hardware around it.”
Which is fine, since it’s MIT software (and why I push for GPL, personally). What’s not fine is a creator calling their commercial product “open” or “DIY” without a BOM or build log.
I would revise the post title regardless of what the author calls it, personally.