• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is neither of those things. Objectively.

    Objectively, huh? This is beside the point that was being made, but you’re just trying to be obstinate. I can have a package installed by the terminal before Discover (the GUI for installing packages) even opens because it takes so long. Objectively it is faster. Subjectivity it’s easier for me.

    The phrase you’re looking for is “can’t be arsed”…

    You may be right, but it appears that both are common and people aren’t sure of the origin, and “can’t be asked” is potentially the original.

    The problem is not that we “can’t be arsed”, the problem is that it’s an unnecessarily convoluted and unintuitive process.

    And going to a website to download an executable to install a specific piece of software, which you need to give permission when executing to get through the firewall because (to your system) it’s just some random executable, isn’t? Then having that executable check for updates when launched and sending you to the website to download a new installer. Are you serious? Do you have Stockholm syndrome? Is Microsoft paying you?

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Objectively, huh?

      Yes huh

      I can have a package installed by the terminal before Discover (the GUI for installing packages) even opens

      Just lying again. You’d have to go and search what words to type in first.

      And going to a website to download an executable to install a specific piece of software, which you need to give permission when executing to get through the firewall because (to your system) it’s just some random executable, isn’t?

      I don’t know what you aren’t understanding about this. All 3 OSs have package managers that function similarly. What I’m talking about is when the software is not available in the package manager

      Then having that executable check for updates when launched and sending you to the website to download a new installer

      You’ve really never used Windows before, have you? That’s once again not how it works. Maybe give it a go and come back after you’ve got some experience.

      Is Microsoft paying you?

      You could make an argument for such a thing insofar as time is money. And like they say “Linux is free so long as your time is worth nothing.”

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Just lying again. You’d have to go and search what words to type in first.

        Lol. No. If I know the name of the package/application, then for me it’s just "sudo packman -S [name]

        I don’t know what you aren’t understanding about this. All 3 OSs have package managers that function similarly. What I’m talking about is when the software is not available in the package manager

        There is a package manager for Windows (WinGet I believe), it just isn’t commonly used, and definitely not by casual users.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          If I know the name of the package/application

          How do you know it?

          There is a package manager for Windows

          Yes, that’s what I said.

          WinGet I believe

          LOL it’s just called Microsoft store, my dude.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Microsoft store is not a package manager, it’s a marketplace. Those are different things.