cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomaster vs mainsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square102linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imagemaster vs mainsh.itjust.workscm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square102linkfedilink
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 months agoI think master came from master record. It makes some sense, as all other branches would be derived from the master branch.
minus-squarebob_lemon@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoThat would make sense for forks, not branches. Although to be fair, the word branch also doesn’t make sense for branches (since those don’t exactly merge back into the trunk).
I think master came from master record. It makes some sense, as all other branches would be derived from the master branch.
That would make sense for forks, not branches. Although to be fair, the word branch also doesn’t make sense for branches (since those don’t exactly merge back into the trunk).