TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 9 months agoIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageIn this dire time ...startrek.websiteTribblesBestFriend@startrek.website to Star Trek Social Club@startrek.websiteEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square16linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoAlso, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument. If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoNo, that would be an and hominem.
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoExactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude
Also, an ad hominem is an attack against the person instead of the argument.
If you attack the argument and then the person, that’s not technically an ad hominem.
No, that would be an and hominem.
Exactly. “No because you’re an idiot” is ad hominem, but “no because x, and you’re an idiot for thinking that” is valid albeit rude