Sounds like you should respond to that with a 400 Bad Request
The server cannot or will not process the request due to something that is perceived to be a client error (e.g., malformed request syntax, invalid request message framing, or deceptive request routing).
The only thing worse than that is emailing them a simple boolean question and then your phone rings.
Sounds like you should respond to that with a 400 Bad Request
x402 … charge for your time.
Valid alternatives: 307 temp redirect to mailbox, 402 payment required to endure such pain or the classic 418. I’d go with the 418.
I might go with a 403 how dare you!
That’s a good one as well. 406, absolutely not acceptable, Sir!
.
What even are you?
A teapot
Someone completely incapable of coming up with a witty comment when it’s my time to shine.
Id ho with
415 Unsupported Media Type
or
426 Upgrade Required
because it’s clearly the wrong protocolWhen you aren’t feeling that async energy but you still get a callback.
I didn’t even register a callback. How the hell did code start randomly executing from here?
That’s a closure