WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, on Sunday night, sparing the younger Biden a possible prison sentence for federal felony gun and tax convictions and reversing his past promises not to use the extraordinary powers of the presidency for the benefit of his family.

The Democratic president had previously said he would not pardon his son or commute his sentence after convictions in the two cases in Delaware and California. The move comes weeks before Hunter Biden was set to receive his punishment after his trial conviction in the gun case and guilty plea on tax charges, and less than two months before President-elect Donald Trump is set to return to the White House.

Biden, who time and again pledged to Americans that he would restore norms and respect for the rule of law after Trump’s first term in office, ultimately used his position to help his son, breaking his public pledge to Americans that he would do no such thing.

  • lzfm@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Off-topic, …with almost everybody having a cell phone in hands why do we still elect anybody to represent us? It’s because that’s how it always been?

    • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      TBF I don’t think a system of thousands of referendums would be much better. What I take bigger issue with is the electoral college, but I don’t have a good solution in mind. Popular vote wouldn’t be much better, especially because of how it would affect campaigning.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      We don’t build bridges by committee, why would politics be better?

      It’s a specific skill set to understand legalese and the processes

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Because it’s hard for a committee of 334,000,000 to make decisions? Maybe I’m misunderstanding your question though. Are you suggesting more of a bottom-up, local-first way of running things? I think there would still have to be representatives at various levels, for the same reason.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Legislation is still pretty complicated, having professional legislators makes sense just as a technical profession.

      We could certainly stand to have more direct input though!