• ownsauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    The article mentions Kairos Power but doesn’t mention that their reactors in development are molten-salt cooled. While they’ll still use Uranium, its a great step in the right direction for safer nuclear power.

    If development continues on this path with thorium molten-salt fueled and cooled reactors, we could see safe and commercially viable nuclear (thorium) energy within our lifetimes.

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-06/china-building-thorium-nuclear-power-station-gobi/104304468

    To my layman’s knowledge, using thorium molten-salt instead of uranium means the reactor can be designed in a way where it can’t melt down like Chernobyl or Fukushima.

    Edit: The other implication of not using uranium is that the leftover material is harder to make in to bombs, so the technology around molten-salt thorium reactors could be spread to current non-nuclear states to meet their energy needs and reduce reliance on coal plants around the planet.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      If development continues on this path

      If we continue down the path of wasting energy and polluting to produce useless shit humanity is screwed.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Boy are they gonna look stupid when they realize that no one outside their little bubble has a use for AI.

    It’s not even close to ready for launch and why are we wasting energy on it?

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      because idiots like me who have no marketable skills can use it to fool ourselves into thinking we can do code/art/literature/etc.

      • glitchdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        actually this (yes, I’m replying to myself). I’m an idiot with no marketable skills. I put boxes on shelves for a living. I want to be an artist, a musician, a programmer, an author. I am so bad at all of these, and between having a full time job, a significant other, and several neglected hobbies, I don’t have time to learn to get better at something I suck at. So I cheat. If I want art done, I could commission a real artist, or for the cost of one image I could pay for dalle and have as many images as I want (sure, none of them will be quite what I want but they’ll all be at least good). I could hire a programmer, or I could have chatgpt whip up a script for me since I’m already paying for it anyway since I want access to dalle for my art stuff. Since I have chatgpt anyway, I might as well use it to help flesh out my lore for the book I’ll never write. I haven’t found a good solution for music.

        I have in my brain a vision for a thing that is so fucking cool (to me), and nobody else can see it. I need to get it out of my brain, and the only way to do that is to actualize it into reality. I don’t have the skills necessary to do it myself, and I don’t have the money to convince anyone else to help me do it. generative AI is the only way I’m going to be able to make this work. Sure, I wish that the creators of the content that were stolen from to train the ai’s were fairly compensated. I’d be ok with my chatgpt subscription cost going up a few dollars if that meant real living artists got paid, I’m poor but I’m not broke.

        These are the opinions of an idiot with no marketable skills.

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          These are the opinions of an idiot with no marketable skills.

          Certainly doesn’t sound like an idiot with no marketable skills to me. You’re coming up with creative ideas and finding ways to try to prove them out in disciplines that you aren’t terribly familiar with. You’re really selling yourself way too short here and should be A LOT more compassionate towards you.

          Really, it sounds like you are in a similar place to Product Management.

          The way that you are approaching things is about diametrically opposite to the sort of problematic behavior that the corpos using LLMs to bludgeon labor are participating in.

      • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Not at all! Nuclear is an excellent compliment to renewables and as a companion source to support the grid they are actually really effective. They’re also really useful in situations where renewables just aren’t an option such as large scale shipping. Obviously we haven’t seen any nuclear container ships yet but that’s mostly around startup and infrastructure costs as well as outdated regulations.

        With small nuclear reactors becoming commonplace I wouldn’t be supprised if we start to see nuclear shipping becoming a thing in industry in the next 20-50 years.

        Its already been proven as a reliable, safe, and effective power source in a naval context. The main hangup people seem to have is with accidents at sea, however again, the militaries of the world have already proven nuclear reactors safe in a number of accidents where a nuclear vessel has been lost and the reactors shut down safely and did not cause release of nuclear material.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          While! I love nuclear’s possibilities. I’ve seen commercial, shippings safety and maintenance records. I don’t think that would be a good idea

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Eh, it’s honestly safer than you’d think. The size of the reactor plays a huge role in safety.

            A reactor sized for a container ship would be literally incapable of melting down, because there just isn’t enough fuel to get to those temperatures. You could then limit the ship’s speed, and over build the reactor a bit, so that the reactor is never truly stressed during normal operation.

            Then for refueling, you just remove the entire reactor and replace it with a new, fully fueled one every 10 years or so.

            That’s where you want your controls.

            Other than that, yeah it would be safer than oil. A crash just means your reactor casing gets wet.

            The main worry is someone cutting into the reactor to take out the spicy rocks… and there are easier ways to get spicy rocks.