EuroMed human rights monitor reports:
When the first groups arrived, Israeli tanks were already stationed in the area. Soldiers then used loudspeakers to command: “Raise your hands and walk in front of the tanks—those who want flour, come forward.” Around 200 civilians complied.
As they neared the aid trucks, Israeli forces suddenly opened heavy fire directly at their heads, instantly killing dozens. Others were left crawling, wounded, and bleeding. The massacre left 80 dead and over 520 injured, many of whom are in critical condition.
Notably, these attacks coincide with the peak of mass starvation across the Gaza Strip, where deaths from malnutrition are now documented and dozens have been hospitalised due to exhaustion and lack of food.
This is exceptionally grim. And fits the preferred narrative that Israel is doing atrocities in Gaza.(Which at least is partially factual)
Hence extra suspicion is warranted when a random tweet is presented as fact.
Always be suspicious of everything! In particular if it fits your world view all too well.
There also is a strong anti genocide sentiment. You are probably confusing what you want to believe about Germans with fact.
They’ve been shooting at civilians at “aid” locations for months, and extra suspicion is warranted?
I am german I see the grim reality of the genocide apologia around me daily… The fact that my countrypeople sicken me is rooted in what I see. “At LeAsT pArTiAlLy FaCtUaL” listen to yourself and be ashamed.
At least partially factual is condemning.
What part of Israel committing atrocities in Gaza is “partially” factual? What part of them openly and hopefully committing a live steamed genocide isn’t entirely factual?
Listen to yourself, as they said, and be ashamed.
At least partially factual is apologia suggesting that it’s “not as bad” as it is. The source is factual, the event happened, treat it as what it is.