• tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
      0·
      2 months ago

      Are the Ubuntu ads in the room with us right now? The only thing I remember is apt telling you about Ubuntu Pro. At that point Plasma is adware too for advertising their donation page.

        • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
          0·
          2 months ago

          I remember that one. The applet that lead to amazon with their referral code. From what I heard from Alan Pope, it did bring in money, but even the manufacturers they worked with always blurred/removed it from their promotional materials. So it got removed for good.

        • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
          0·
          2 months ago

          Ah yes. Complaining about the minimal version of the distro not being minimal due to a 2.6mb package. Canonical is a true monster.

          • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
            0·
            2 months ago

            You gave a snarky response implying that there aren’t ads on Ubuntu and they replied with confirmation from a developer that they’ll be forcing ads on ubuntu.

            Are you still arguing that canonical isn’t serving ads on Ubuntu? Or are you just being an ass because you were proven wrong?

            • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
              0·
              2 months ago

              There are no ads on Ubuntu. The terminal reminding you that Pro exists is not an ad. Or do we consider Plasma as having ads now? I read that they will be asking their users to donate once a year.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.netEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    Snap should be reason enough that everyone should abandon Ubuntu, especially when Mint is right there. The last thing we need is to make Linux more like Android+Google Play.

    • tsugu@slrpnk.netOP
      0·
      2 months ago

      I politely disagree. Try to look at Snaps this way: Canonical maintains 16.04, 18.04, 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04. Each with their own repos. Each has to be properly maintained. With snap they can release the package a single time, and it can be used across all of their releases. I think this is the main point of snap. Being able to use it across other systemd distros is just a bonus.

  • IsoSpandy@lemm.ee
    0·
    2 months ago

    Use whatever fits your use case. Hell build a LFS distro. That’s why it’s YOUR computer.

    The penguin is the messiah of freedom.

  • rockstarmode@lemmy.world
    0·
    2 months ago

    I see a lot of references to Ubuntu being filled with ads or scaring people into buying their services, but I’ve been daily driving it for over 15 years on personal desktops and servers and never noticed that. What have I missed?

    I never saw the Amazon ad stuff, I hear it was a referral link?

    Last I checked Ubuntu Pro is free for personal use on up to 5 machines.

    I use apt to manage all my packages and upgrades, including dist-upgrade, maybe that’s why I’ve never noticed snap? Why does snap suck?

    • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
      0·
      2 months ago

      Snaps are a closed-source proprietary packaging format that Canonical controls. And they have also altered apt on Ubuntu to download snaps first before native packages. You may be using snaps right now without realizing it, which is also part of the issue.