• d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think this is pretty troubling. Including myself in the sentiment that the self-hosting community needs to do better. Aside from funding individual projects, are there any organizations that help fund self-hosting projects?

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      How so? 40%-ish is actually pretty good!

      I’m also in the “no” bucket, but I’ve contributed bug reports and do intend to donate soonish now that I use more visible projects (used to just be minidlna, BTRFS, and openSUSE). I only added Jellyfin a few months ago, and I do intend to donate since I don’t intend to report bugs or contribute code.

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        True, it’s a good percentage, and probably better than most free software. That said, given the communities the self hosted apps support, their excitement for the products, and for some the essential nature of some of these apps, it would be nice to see the yes/no number more 50/50 at least.

          • Alk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have subscribed to a couple projects on github (the recurring payment thing) and purchased the optional immich license. I think the immich license is a great model, and more projects should do it.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Agreed. Grayjay has something similar, though it’s not actually FOSS (it’s source-available though). I’m happy to pay for software, but donating somehow has a different feel to it and doesn’t feel as “necessary.” So yes, an optional license fee would be awesome for more projects and could encourage more people to actually pay.

              • Alk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I love that it doesn’t unlock any features, but it does prominently display in the app as “activated” or whatever. It feels like “yeah, I have paid my portion, I am now entitled to use this forever guilt-free”

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t wanna ask if and how much individuals contributed to the ones that host their instances ;)

    • justcallmelarry@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m in the no-bucket, but instead i spend time on issues, helping the community and sometimes code contributions to self hosted projects instead.

      This is not taken into the account of the question, however, but should be considered as contributing.

      (I also consider donating to be contributing.)

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Agreed. I’m not much of a coder, so the best contribution I can give is probably $$. At least until I get off my ass and learn something new!

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I also think that it is up to the developers to make it sustainable

      If they want funding they need to seek it. It has been shown that when a project has a one time donation popup they can raise a significant amount of money. They aso could sell products or services.

    • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      100% of my self-hosted projects are run exclusively by my recurrent donations.

      Good thing nobody’s asking about what I’ve donated to the software projects I’m using to self-host.

    • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, really don’t get this one. As an example, I’ve been supporting the guy who writes most of the software I use via Github sponsors for a while, now. It’s nice to get access to additional support chat rooms and perks and stuff, but just the feeling alone is satisfying enough.

      Feelsgoodman.jpg

      I genuinely recommend those with gainful employment to consider supporting the people who make the software and media you like (E.g. Patreon).

      Issue reports and the likes are nice, but they’re really not a substitute for cash (in my opinion).