• Bilb!@lem.monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        This need not be the case, though! There’s an open source client on Android called Keyguard. I don’t think the desktop app was at all useful anyway. You can just log into your Vaultwarden through any browser. The desktop app is pointless.

        • 486@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Keyguard isn’t open source. Have a look at their license. It just says “All rights reserved”.

        • pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 days ago

          They now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            And the whole conversation is about a bug, not a change in direction…

            Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it’s a “packaging bug” and that “Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model.”

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            Only the desktop client. And the response is that not being able to compile sans SDK is an issue they will resolve.

            I still think this is bad directionally, but we need to see what happens.