MHLoppy@fedia.io to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agoVibe coding your MFAfedia.ioexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkVibe coding your MFAfedia.ioMHLoppy@fedia.io to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square70fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareno_username@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agowhat if 435841 is the most secure 6 digit numerical code? why use another?
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoI use the random number 4, I even rolled a dice to get a real random number instead of those “pseudo” random numbers. (XKCD?)
minus-squarepleasejustdie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoThis goes back even further, Randall is referencing the ps3 security, that has a constant instead of a random number. That allowed failOverflow to remove one variable and reverse the private key to sign ps3 apps.
what if 435841 is the most secure 6 digit numerical code?
why use another?
I use the random number 4, I even rolled a dice to get a real random number instead of those “pseudo” random numbers. (XKCD?)
This goes back even further, Randall is referencing the ps3 security, that has a constant instead of a random number. That allowed failOverflow to remove one variable and reverse the private key to sign ps3 apps.
https://xkcd.com/221/