• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    stop promoting brave. oh my god it’s 2025 how good is their propaganda… they were never cool.

  • DigitalMus@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Not a search engine, but last week I learned of the European Open Websearch project, which builds a new free and open search index. It should already be ready to try out. Hopefully we will see some search engines implementing this soon.

  • Tenderizer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I really wish Kagi wasn’t American. Kagi is such a good product, and I’d be willing to pay for it, but in no universe am I willing to pump more money into silicon valley.

  • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I really wish Qwant would add the ability for me to Seach “1 eur to usd” and just get the results.

    Along with “tsla” and “23 *3” and just get results.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 day ago

    Daily reminder that

    • Brave’s CEO donates to homophobic organizations and
    • Brave is connected to the BAT pay-to-surf scam

    Don’t use Brave.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Me too. Kagi is the best of them all, including Google.

      The only downside? It’s an American company.

        • Tenderizer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m okay with forsaking one avocado toast a month for a search engine that actually works, but if I don’t feel good about where my money goes then I’m signficantly less willing.

          I like spending money on the things I use. The status of paying customer is an enviable position (minus the paying part).

        • Rexios@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          How terrible that you have to pay for a product you use

          No one wanting to pay for anything is what got us into this mess in the first place

          • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I was thinking about the aspect of privacy. Not only do you need a user, you also have to give them your payment details.

            And don’t get me started on their “300 searches a month”-bullshit. If I pay for 300 searches, I want my 300 searches. Regardless of how long it takes me to use it.

    • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      For Search, it is about finding the least bad option and hope that they will become more independent. Mojeek (fully independent but poor quality) or Qwant (building own index, but dependent on Bing)

    • wakest@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Stract is impressive I don’t know what more people don’t know about it

  • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Worth noting about Startpage: they’re part of System1, an American advertising/marketing company. Sytem1 claims that privacy is one of the biggest focuses though. Make of that what you will.

  • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    For now I’ll stick with SearXNG, it’s among the first things I get up and running when I distro hop, but I’m glad there are other non-US options to try.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Very strange to put Kagi as “less private” when it’s the only non-self-hosted option that allows for completely private searches with their Privacy Pass tokens. You can access them with Tor, pay with crypto (not really that private though), and sign up with a fake email. https://kagi.com/privacy#anonymity

    • FallenWalnut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It isn’t marked as less private. It is grayed out because it is not based in Europe. I personally use them as I find them the best option with what is out there.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        The text at the bottom says “kagi doesn’t collect any identifying data, but does require an account, so it is considered less private than the alternatives”.

        • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I think that’s Walnut’s nod to the fact that PrivacyGuides still hasn’t wrapped their head around the concept of paid search.

          I haven’t seen any legitimate evidence that Kagi’s Privacy Pass is any less private than any other search option on the market, but long ago PG defined private search as “not requiring an account” and are completely locked up on that concept.

          Even though just about every VPN on the planet (and all of their recommended ones) require accounts, as do most of the other services they recommend. The world is just so used to “free” search (which just sells your data or your time) that they don’t know what to do with a new business model.

        • Tenderizer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          With fingerprinting and even just IP tracking, I think the question is more whether they can be trusted to not track you (i.e. whether it makes business sense).

      • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Of course, it depends on how you set the crawler, i.e. how deep because of subdomains and how far links to other domains etc. are.

        I crawl 71 pages: My index is currently 4,576,319 documents ( i crawled sites like github too )and occupies just under 14GB

        The results depend on several factors. For example, whether you only use local or p2p. But then it also has a number of settings and you can also explicitly control what is responsible for the results down to the smallest detail. But I have to be honest and say that I haven’t dealt with this at all (especially since it’s a bit complex in some cases) because I want to expand my list of pages to crawl myself first and I only use it locally. I still regularly use duckduckgo to search. However, if you take the time for it you will get what you want in terms of quality of results.

        Ah well, depending on how you set up the crawler, it consumes system resources accordingly. However, you can set and limit the utilization of RAM and storage space. The same goes for network utilization, which is pretty important because otherwise no other connections would be possible besides crawling xD