• utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can’t talk for others I’m personally interested in Linux phones (I have 2, PinePhone and PinePhone Pro) because I do not want to rely on Android because it’s lead, maintained and basically in practice owned by Google.

    I would also much prefer to have “just” Linux because I know it better and because IMHO we reached a point, already few years ago, where “mobile” does not mean much anymore. “just” a computer with a battery is enough due to the power available.

    IMHO the SteamDeck is the existence proof of that.

    Linux desktop apps are not exactly secure.

    Can you please clarify?

    • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      The “know it better” is, I think, a big argument, that’s imo often a bit overlooked. Android does not have that much “hackers” as “proper” Linux has. For the average Gnome DE @ Ubuntu user, Android forks are fine. But if you’re the kind of person, who searches for random scripts on Github, you won’t get that experience on LineageOS.

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Android does not have that much “hackers” as “proper” Linux has

        It’s hard for Android to have hackers precisely because Google and manufacturers are trying their best to prevent that. They do not allow rooting, they blocks features on rooted devices, etc. So they do their absolute best to keep on exercising control despite collaborating on open source software.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        … so why are eg flatpak apps less secure than Android ones?

        And Play & Apple stores are full of unchecked scam apps. They basically are solving this by securing the os more. Yet apps (even Instagram) can still take pics without your action. I assume they listed in on you too.

        The app (& SDK) argument I think has more to do with user- and dev-base. Something that Microsoft failed at in the mobile market. So basically we need a quality/seamless way of running Android apps on Linux.

        And since we can run Win games on Linux very nicely I think this wouldn’t be that much of an issue … Tho minimal industry support (eg banking apps) is still needed.

        • utopiah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          we need a quality/seamless way of running Android apps on Linux

          Like Waydroid? There was a thread recently on that and it seemed (even though not necessarily a representative sample) most people used it for… games, not “actual” applications. They were NOT used for banking apps also (at least I don’t remember anybody mentioning that) because I bet most people just go on their bank website for that.