• barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    It’s bad enough that they are using AI to create their content, but don’t they even proof-read it before uploading it? It seems like the most basic requirement, but they don’t even seem to be bothering with that.

  • 3rr4tt1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    AI can be ethically used in writing. This is not an example of that. People need to get into the “AI as a tool” mindset. And capitalism causing greed is part of the issue of course.

    • CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      Writing is a rare form of communication, borderline unique to humans. Because of that, to me, it’s fundamentally unethical to have “AI” “write” anything. It’s insulting to me on a base level, particularly when used for communication.

  • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Hate this title, how about:

    “A novel by author Lena McDonald, accidentally leaves AI prompt in published version.”

    • Photuris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well, you certainly can complain about it and still use it, when your livelihood requires you to either use the tech, or get left behind by those who do. Speed and turnaround time wins over skill and quality.

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I don’t know if it’s necessary a bad thing. Presumably these people were enjoying the book until they read this. It’s kind of like the invention of the printing press. Sure, the content may not be artistically crafted any more, and there may be waaaay more slop. But I bet we will end up getting way more high quality content too.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I disagree.

        While Ai might help at systemising and/or summarising already existing information, I wouldn’t rely on it at all for any creative thought. And what’s worse, the more people spare content like this, the more tolerant they’ll become to it, bringing the overall quality down.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      My son and I laughed our asses off over that presentation. Brilliant but kind of disgusting.

    • They don’t mention enshittification - I think Doctorow popularized the term later - but this is a perfect example of a process that contributes to the phenomenon.

      I had never thought about it in these terms, but they repeatedly mentioned curation, and it’s so clearly a fundamental topic in today’s online world.

      This was an incredible video, thanks for sharing. It gave me a new perspective to consider.