• gsv@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Tbh, I understand the problem. There are just so many volunteers for making newer developments work on every platform. Streamlining the development and easing the load on the volunteer devs seems a good idea. Having that said, it’s ofc a pity to drop support for devices. At least the LTS kernels will support the current support for a while and the vibrant Linux community will find a good way to work it out, I have no doubt. Many machines, in particular old ones, run with very old kernels to begin with…

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    On the plus side, somebody’s been working on getting Linux to run on a Commodore-64. So I’m pretty sure the 486 won’t be left behind for long.

    • runeko@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      That’s all we needed back on the 90s. Three for the government to run their wargames, one for each major university to run their interwebs pump. one for each blue-chip company to make sure they were complying with trickle-down economics. The remaining were sold overseas to allied countries so they could bootstrap themselves out of the late Renaissance. What a heady time it was to be alive.

    • Deebster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Are you saying you think it’s ridiculous to end support “already”?

      I think it’s likely that anyone still using 486s isn’t updating software anyway, so it’s unlikely to matter aside from niches like retro devices. Luckily, open source means that if there’s a genuine desire there’ll probably be a fork to provide it.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Just as the MiSTer has started putting (sorta) 486s back in people’s hands, although if the newly required instructions aren’t too complicated, I suppose someone could conceivably add them to the core.

    I guess one unknown for me is how the capability detection of the kernel works and if it works on instruction detection or if it determines it via CPUID.

    A big also is that I’ve not yet tried to run Linux on mine yet so I’m not even sure it’s possible with a modern kernel anyway. I think I remember seeing someone got an old version of redhat or Debian working

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I’ve seen a whole raft of 386 machines on AliExpress recently. I need to investigate what’s actually in them .

      Edit: it’s just 386s Edit 2: 386 soc on board

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Ah I believe those are powered by chips originally intended to be used in industrial control use cases.

        Loads of old manufacturing machines & software out there that are built around a 386/486, and given intel hasn’t exactly been making those models in a good while, some companies stepped up to provide compatible replacements for those situations.

        Someone on AliExpress had the idea of using them in a more pc-like product for retro gaming, and voila we have all these modern 386/486 clones

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah they seem to be M6117 386 soc. They’re a bit pricey to buy on a whim, but I’ll keep an eye out, might be fun to tinker with.