• NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Do you realise I’m a different person to the other poster? You told them to read the website and you are telling me not to read the website.

    I already clicked through to the source, an RT article, which is clearly labelled as posted by the Russian part of BRICS.

    I also looked up the MP, who was expelled from her liberal party for corrupt activities and now represents the party of an oligarch which has less than 1% of the national vote share.

    So yes in conclusion, it is Russian propaganda. Who knows if the 100,000 figure is true, she is the only source, but without context it doesn’t really mean anything anyway.

    Was I supposed to read all that or not?

    • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Are you seriously just bad at reading btw? I was extremely clear I am making fun of you for reading random widgets on the site instead of ONE PAGE. Every news article you complain about is like one page of information and you have to be dragged kicking and screaming 😭🤧

    • Southern Boy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      In my first reply I already told you it was Russian propaganda, in addition to 4 other countries’. Nobody told you not to read the website, I told you to respond to the content of the actual article if you want to pretend to actually reply, not dick around exploring every link you find.

      She is the ONLY SOURCE? Do you think that a member of Ukrainian parliament is going to get away with lying about what the military is saying? The lack of context exists only because of your lack of investigation into the subject.

      • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Thanks for the additional context.

        The additional context: “yes, I posted a propaganda article, but your investigation of the source and the source of the source wasn’t enough. You need to investigate more but I won’t provide any links or other sources.”