• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m of the opinion that Google produces the specifications in bad faith, choosing features and constructions that are costly to implement to prevent others from entering the market. For example, see WebUSB. It’s a completely unnecessary standard at the very least and waste developer time. Other browsers have not bothered to implement it, generally calling it out for being a dumb specification.

    With that said yes there are standards, but primarily pushed and controlled by one company that is not interested in others writing web browsers. Hopefully they’re forced to divest themselves from Chrome.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      You seem to know more about it than I do, and I generally agree with your assessment. Either way ladybird has a talented team of paid engineers and tons of community contributors, so I’m choosing to believe in them even if Google is doing their best to stop them!