The scariest part of this recent news is that TM Signal seem(ed) to be interoperable. People using TM Signal could interact with actual Signal users. How are you to know whether or not your groups have people using bastardized versions of Signal? Are things like Session interoperable with Signal?

  • root@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Yes of course. Signal can archive messages and they can be restored, you can screenshot messages and you can have them backed up as part of a policy like icloud backups.

    My question is more about how do you know you’re interacting with an authentic signal client, and not a bastardized one.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      At the moment you can’t. The only realistic way I could see that happening is if the servers would check the app’s digital signature and refuse the app from communicating with the official infrastructure if it didn’t match.

        • weedwolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, I use the molly fork because there’s features I like about it. I’d be sad if I couldn’t use it anymore. :(

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          That’s the point of digitally signing the app, to ensure its authenticity and integrity. TM and others wouldn’t be able to resign the modified app with the Signal Foundation signature.

          EDIT: Yeah after thinking more about it it’s not a trivial problem, as you need to assume that the endpoint is inherently untrusted.