• wer2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I know someone that still uses ed for all their code editing.

  • gradual@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Honestly, CSS is a fucking joke and its solely to blame for why centering something isn’t always straightforward.

    By the way, this picture is a crock of shit for people who aren’t programmers. Anyone who is a programmer will not take it seriously because programming is so much more about helping others instead of shaming them.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I started with C++ and went to Java to .NET to Javascript and now to Terraform.

    I know this is all a joke but there’s something definitely different with the ones above and the ones below. There’s a bit of satisfaction you can get sometimes when you’re working with memory directly and getting faster feedback (yes, there’s more math back then and it wasn’t easy to look stuff up, for sure). However, there’s new challenges nowadays … there’s so many layers on top of layers. I feel as though Stack Overflow and ChatGPT are so needed because the error messages and things we give are obfuscated or unclear (not always any library author’s fault as there’s compatibility issues, etc)

    We’re doing serverless stuff at my current company and none of our devs run code locally. They have to upload it using CDK or Serverless Framework to run on the cloud. We don’t use SST so we can’t set breakpoints but like that’s a lot of crap inbetween just running your code already. Not even getting into the libraries and transpilers and stuff we use. I spent like a few weeks over Christmas to get our devs to run the code locally. Guess what? None of them use it because they’re so use to uploading it. I was like, "you can put breakpoints in it! you can have nodemon and it instant reloads! nope, none of them care … "

      • andioop@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        First learning is last learning.

        I’ll be the dumb one to ask: what do you mean? Is this that making a mistake that costs a lot is the best teacher, because you only have to mess it up once to learn it forever?

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s a mantra about teaching people and then expecting them to forget it. Doesn’t work. They’ll default to what they already know.

          My freshman English teacher got married in October and I called her by her maiden name the entire year.

          Like all programming mantras, it’s not universally true, but it’s annoyingly reliable. It reflects the shape of the human brain.

        • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Pretty sure they mean people don’t learn something again when they already learned it. Once you learn how to do something, willingness to learn it again but a different way dries up, and so you stick to bad habits as long as they ‘work’

  • applemao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I still want to get into coding the OG manual way (because I enjoy pain and disappointment apparently) but now it seems like a waste of time since vibe coders and 13 year olds already are lightyears ahead of me. Also I have no reason to learn it, all apps are already built xD

    • gradual@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      all apps are already built

      Couldn’t be further from the truth. You also have to consider competition.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m in the same boat. I used to be an amateur front and back end web developer. Almost made a text based RPG in middle school. I had to stop when shit got crazy in high school and college, but I don’t feel like any programming is worth my time right now. I’m focusing on gardening and maybe some cooking. You know, human activities that we can still enjoy.

  • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I can’t remember some syntax unless I do it at least 100 times. I often look up stuff that I have already done before and know because of my goldfish memory.

    • letsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Same way you did it in 2024 but it’s easier because the springgirdles have been replaced with rotated manglebrackets.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Depends if you’re centering the div or the things in the div. Which has probably been the main issue since CSS was invented.

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If using plain CSS, usually it’s enough to set width appropriately, and margin-left and margin-right to auto.

      If using a Modern Frontend/CSS Framework, then may God have mercy on your poor soul.

      (Seriously I just started a new project with TailwindCSS and I’m so confused. But not entirely desperate yet.)

      • loics2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        w-... mx-auto, replace the 3 dots with your desired width value, and that’s it with tailwind

      • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m doing a small hobby project (a ladder/ranking system for playing beer sports with my community), and I tried out Tailwind.

        I gave up and loaded Bootstrap instead, but I will probably end up just writing all the CSS myself.

        Seems so silly to have 15 CSS classes on a single DOM element…

          • gradual@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Shouldn’t they be designed in an intuitive manner that makes misuse more difficult than regular use?

            Otherwise, why even bother using them? It’s like now you need to know all the ins and outs of CSS and a trendy framework that will lock you into their ecosystem.

            • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Kidding aside, I think the popular frameworks these days are incredibly well made. Frontend web has always been hell, and if your job is producing functional web GUIs, you can’t do it on a large scale without them.

              • gradual@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Based on my own experience developing GUIs, I’ve reached the conclusion that creating them through code is obsolete.

                We should be focusing on developing GUIs to develop GUIs, like Godot, instead of ‘frameworks’ that make an obsolete method of doing things even more cumbersome and complex.

        • gradual@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think they exist because of ignorance.

          People who don’t understand how to do a task will usually choose the wrong tools for that task.

          If someone is trying to cover up their lack of knowledge, they will usually make things more complicated than they need to be.

        • toddestan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Generally I find many these frameworks will make some complicated things simple, but the cost is some things that were once simple are now complicated. They can be great if you just need the things they simplify - or in other words can stick to what they were intended for, but my favorite way of keeping things simple is to avoid using complicated and heavy frameworks.

        • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 hours ago

          If you spend a lot of time on a single framework, you will transcend and become a sort of frontend diety, growing multiple extra limbs allowing you to type in CSS classes faster than any mere mortal

            • gradual@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              What’s sad is that web development is only a nightmare so websites can be worse.

              I genuinely believe it’s part of the concerted effort by the cabal to make us accept a ‘new normal.’

              They don’t want an environment where anyone feels like they can make a website. They want us to believe we need to spend years studying before we can do anything, and even then we can only do what our bosses tell us to.

    • impedans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      If you define what you mean by centering I’ll give you a straight answer.

      Vertically? Horizontally? Center the text or the entire box? Compared to the viewport, the parent container or the entire page?

      “Centering” isn’t as straight forward as you’d think, and what you actually want usually depends on the situation.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Fuck it, align=‘center’. That’ll center it horizontally relative to some context and if that’s not good enough then you should have been more precise in your request.

        • impedans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yeah that works if you wanna center a box of content it relative to the parent container, either horizontally or vertically. For other situations we’ve got different tools

    • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I first tried vi in the early 90s, before I had easy access to online resources. I had to open a new shell and kill the vi process to exit it. Next time I dialed into my usual BBS I asked how to exit that thing. But since then I’ve liked it, because vi has been on every system I ever ssh’ed into.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You quit it just like you quit ed or ex, just that you have to enter the prompt (:) yourself as vi is not by default in prompt mode. And you should know ed, ed is the standard editor.

        I use Helix btw.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I can exit Vim, it just feels like trying to rip out the dashboard and the interiors from a family car because race cars also lack them. Kate is a good speedy alternative to VSCode, not to mention it also does not have Microsoft’s greedy hands on it.

        • toddestan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Out of the box, Vim’s default configuration is very basic as it’s trying to emulate vi as close as possible. It like if you want things like headlights or a heater or a tachometer in your family car, you got to create a vimrc and turn those features on. That was my experience when I first started using Vim - I spent a lot of time messing around creating a vimrc until I got things the way I wanted.

          One of the big changes with Neovim is their default settings are a lot more like what you would expect in a modern text editor.

  • excral@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    My experience is that the programmers from the first row very much still exist. My theory is that the number of programmers from the first row stayed the about same or even increased slightly. There are so many more so called “programmers” overall now, however, that in relation the first row programmers are much rarer now. And to be fair, you don’t need a programmer capable of programming entire games in assembly to center a div.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And vice versa, you don’t need to know how to centre a div to create a game in assembler. I’m comfortable using pointers and managing memory, but don’t ask me to do anything with web UI.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This can be generalized to say that programming has become such a diverse profession that you will find experts in one area that know very little about others. There’s simply too many things that are programmed in too many ways for anyone to know it all anymore. Hell, that was the case in the 70’s and 80’s too.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m guessing that someone who figured out how to keep a high score box centered on screen using assembly will figure it out to do it with CSS.

        The reverse, not so much…

        • groet@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 hours ago

          But you dont what the code of the assembly-style centered div in your codebase. Because nobody will be able to read it and understand what it even does. There are abstraction specific ways to solve problems and the right way to do something in assembly is not the right way to do it in CSS.

          • Estradiol Enjoyer @lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Agreed, in my limited experience with both CSS is like the conceptual opposite of assembly. When I do web design I tell it what I want to look like but can’t see how it’s getting there because that’s done for me. Assembly is the lowest level of abstraction we’ve got and it took me ages to write a little program for class that returns an argument in it (Jasmin VM) and then get GCC to compile it.

            I would say that CSS is like doing an incantation that magically makes the site look good if you do it right, and assembly is like building something by hand.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    QA: “Yeah, Hi. Can you look at this defect ticket?”

    Reading ticket details…

    Me: “Let me guess. Is [whatshisname] responsible for this?”

    QA: “Yeah.”

    Me: “Get him to fix it.”

    QA: “I tried. Like four times.”

    Me: Sigh “I’ll take care of it.”

    QA: “Thank you!”