• Account_93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 hours ago

    99% of my Feed on Bluesky was just people saying they’ve left Twitter for Bluesky. No amount of suggest less of this helped.

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 hours ago

      happens on every “new” social media platform that is similar to another social media platform. Was all over Lemmy when people were “boycotting” reddit…course most went right back to reddit when the boycotting was over.

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Morrowind would keep me there but i dont really have much to say about it anyways in terms of posts (that hasnt already been said) so ion need it myself :3

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      On my feed it’s just pictures of pets and people who I don’t know making lists of things they like. But to be fair, I just installed the app today.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Haha there is a gigantic wave of people switching over from twitter right now, that’s just what is on people’s minds. The conversation will move on soon enough.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Just like when Threads launched and or when Reddit made the API changes. You get a flood of new users who want to talk about being new users.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I’ve started removing trash sites. I blocked twatter and reddit at my router.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Ha ha ha, yeah, sure. Bluesky won’t defeat xitter, at best it’ll just be the “next thing” once xitter finally finishes getting rid of most of its users, which I guess will take more than 4 years from now.

    • blarth@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’ll only defeat X if corporations and specifically media and sports entities start using it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The great thing about BlueSky is how under-the-radar its flown for the last few years. Virtually no advertising. No legions of bot accounts spamming with invites and generic attention baiting posts. No |>u33y N |3io blowing up my mentions. No enshittification, because its just a primitive clone of the original Bird Site.

      The more popular it gets, the less likely that’ll last. BlueSky won’t defeat Twitter until it becomes Twitter.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        My issue with BS is it took VC money from crypto bros.

        What do we think will happen when they come looking for their returns on investment?

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It will almost certainly become Twitter as it was created by the Twitter founder. The only difference being that it will become the Twitter from before Musk took over. Which is a massive difference.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s worse than that.

          Blockchain Capital LLC was co-founded by Steve Bannon pal Brock Pierce, a major crypto advocate, perennial presidential candidate, and close friend of Eric Adams. Pierce has dozens of other shady MAGA/Russia ties as well.

          https://toad.social/@davetroy/113476797192400901

          Dorsey’s already out, the people running the project are from the TESCREAL gang.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The only difference being that it will become the Twitter from before Musk took over.

          Dorsey is just as emotionally stunted and socially reactionary as Musk. He simply isn’t as wealthy.

          BlueSky has thrived not because Dorsey crafted it into a purer vision, but because he’s neglected it and allowed the user base to have their way.

          • realitista@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I never liked Twitter to begin with so I’m not one to defend him. My preferred one is Mastodon, but generally I don’t like the format to begin with. At any rate, I’ll still take pre-musk Twitter over Xitter any day.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Things were better before they got worse, sure.

              But the problem in these systems is the trade off between centralization (consolidated control and monolithic content) and federation (poor navigation/petty administrative feuds/less quality content). Switching from Twitter to BlueSky relieves you from the current admin’s fuckups, but you’re still stuck in a flawed system.

              • realitista@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I fully agree. When I feel like using a Twitter like platform (which is exceedingly rare), I use Mastodon

      • nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I guess they don’t consider it bluesky defeating twitter if twitter is commiting suicide. Sounds like pedantry to me.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            The key factor in Digg’s demise was a flawed design that was too easily abused by users. Digg had no controls over user verification, so individuals could game the system by creating multiple accounts to artificially inflate the number of votes for their own content. Because Digg displayed content in order of popularity, most visitors saw and voted only on content that was already popular. This system created a vicious cycle in which a small number of dedicated users could push their own content to the front page and thereby gain more followers, allowing them to more easily repeat the process. As Digg grew, so too did its problems related to power-hungry users cheating and gaining undue influence over content.

            Sounds like the same problem that every centralized social media ecosystem suffers from. The big difference between Digg and Reddit was that Reddit successfully monetized the “push me to the front of the queue” algorithm rather than engineering around it.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Why people cannot see that the core problem of twitter is not that it got bought by the asshole billionaire. It’s that the asshole billionaire was able to buy it.

    • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Wasn’t he forced to do so after trying to back out, or am I either imagining that or thinking of someone else?

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It’s a little more complex than that. He, like, was buying shares, blew past the 5% ownership disclosure point, failed to disclose, was forced to disclose his stake. He was then offered a seat on the board, didn’t like the lack of control, and made a meme offer on the remaining stake to take the company private, tried to pull out, and was forced to buy the company he didn’t want to buy by the board of directors who didn’t want him to buy it.

        He’s the recent Adam Conover interview with the details: https://youtu.be/sxG2Y3E0uEY?si=r0VMY7s3iZ9uaP39

      • CellarRat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If I recall correctly he could have backed out but he would have had to pay I think 1billion as a penalty and worse admit things didnt go his way

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          13 hours ago

          300 Billion dollar portfolio, 34 Billion dollar loss (~22 Billion after he writes it off in “taxes”) and he has his own right-wing media company chocked full of nutters.

          I don’t think he cares much about the individual Billions much these days. Half his Tesla stock is securing his debt.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Mastodon is more of a protocol than a single service. It succeeds/fails on those terms, in the same way the old Web1.0 protocols did. Which is to say, you can’t enshitify a thousand micro-sites at once like you can enshittify one big site that’s under central control. But you also can’t do things like navigate, search, and socialize efficiently.

      Mastodon is successful in large part because it isn’t. When you let a single cartel of corporate psychos run a Mastodon account like they would a Twitter or Facebook, you end up with Truth Social (literally just a Mastodon branch instance).

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        ActivityPub is the protocol though. Mastodon is an implementation of the protocol.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s an interesting perspective. Do you think the same about lemmy? While also decentralized using the sameprotocol, it seems reasonably efficient to me. I’m from a small instance from my country, and the global content is easily available to me.

        I just have a lot of trouble explaining how it works to people who aren’t tech savy… this is what I consider the main issue withthe fediverse as a whole.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Do you think the same about lemmy?

          I think it depends on how the federated sites are administered going forward. We’ve already seen bigger sites - like Threads, for instance - try to integrate into the overall ecosystem. And I could see a future in which one of the larger instances - a .world or .sh.itjust.works - is too much for a handful of amateur admins to handle. Hand off the instance to a venture capital firm and you could see rapid enshitification.

          I just have a lot of trouble explaining how it works to people who aren’t tech savy…

          I’m reasonably tech savvy and even I’d struggle to tell you exactly how it works. How is .world hosted? Is it load-balanced or otherwise optimized? Who controls registration and which other instances does it integrate with? How do you find a list of active instances to federate against? Who do you even talk to in order to federate with another instance? What does the API look like and which instances allow you to crawl them? How do bots integrate with the environment and what can an admin do to limit them? No idea.

          There’s a bunch of things I think I should be able to do but I can’t. For instance, signing into .world but only surfing content that’s hosted on .sh.itjust.works.

          There’s also a lot of petty politics. Admins deciding on a whim who to block, whether it be individuals or whole instances. Waking up one day and suddenly not having access to a dozen of my favorite subs, because two admins are feuding, is not particularly fun. I never have a problem like that on BlueSky or Instagram.

          • prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            a .world or .sh.itjust.works - is too much for a handful of amateur admins to handle. Hand off the instance to a venture capital firm and you could see rapid enshitification.

            Lemmy is federalized. It is expected that many .worlders would just jump ship to another instance. And I don’t see how the venture capital firm could stop them… For as long as one organization doesn’t control 60%+ of all user’s instances we should be unshitifiable. It is possible for enshitification to happen… but it is of a greater difficulty, because the other non-shit instances still exist and they are federated, thus able to access the same content.

            They could try and pull up the drawbridge and de-federate from every other instance that isn’t under the control of the firm so that the content of the venture capital instances are exclusive, but for as long as they don’t control 60%+ of all user’s instances we are good.

            It is not to hard to imagine that, if .world where to be sold like that, half or more would jump ship. At least that’s what I hope.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It is expected that many .worlders would just jump ship to another instance.

              Why? Why wouldn’t they just consume the click bait content and shameless pandering propagated by the incoming owner, just like folks still on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit?

              For as long as one organization doesn’t control 60%+ of all user’s instances

              You don’t need 60% of instances. You need the plurality of site content. That’s what the users are coming for.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            We’ve already seen bigger sites - like Threads, for instance - try to integrate into the overall ecosystem.

            People complain that the mainstream sites are relatively closed ecosystems, but they also complain when those sites try to be more open ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Bluesky is (in theory) federated, but I think you can’t run your own server yet. We’ll see if they keep their promise.

      Its protocol has some improvements over ActivityPub, for example you can use a domain name you own as your username even if you’re not hosting your own instance, and your user identity is portable in that case - you can move to a different instance but keep the same username.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They took crypto bros VC money.

        Do we really think they’ll allow mass federation without getting returns on their investment?

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      There was a good explanation about why not mastodon the other day. It basically boils down to Bluesky is just an easier transition.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s what I heard from my microblogging colleagues too. They tried Mastodon during the first wave of Twitter exodus, found it too frustrating/difficult, tried Bluesky and stuck with it ever since.

    • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What’s the difference, really? Aren’t they both decentralized microblogging social networks?

      • prototype_g2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        BlueSky isn’t decentralised yet. Right now the only thing that is decentralized is data storage. You can’t set up an independent federated instance yet. They promise they will add that feature, but it hasn’t happened yet.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 hours ago

        One is a product with investors selling itself on promises of decentralization (bluesky), the other is a genuine community tool (mastodon) that actually provides decentralization.

  • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I wonder if the next president could do something to stop that… seems like the head of DOGE might like it (or not, if that means contrarians disappear and stop “community noting” his posts, and allow for a more echoey chamber)

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just hope federal services (like applying for a passport) don’t become Twitter-only after Trump appoints Elon as Secretary of Enshittification.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      [Deleted]

      I’ve made a huge mistake breaking my personal rule to avoid all political content and I’ve regretted that immediately

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        It’s more than 4 years. We just crawled out of Trump inflation and now are going right back in.

        Dismantling and breaking is easy. They can do a lot of that in 4 yrs. Building takes decades.

        There’s also a global effect. Would Putin have ever attacked Ukraine without a Trump term? How about Israel’s taking self defense into genocide territory?

        America leads by example and the last example was an impulsive 3 yo with a giant military force and a dead diplomacy department in the executive branch. There’s permissiveness in that.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        110
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thing is, mate…fascists rarely stay inside their boarders. This is going to be the whole world’s problem in about 3 months.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          international us policy is very similar between republicans and democrats. you guys are already the whole worlds problem. 🌍🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

          im sorry but trump will be your problem. until the empire decides to turn up the violence dial again that is, which is something both parties do sometimes.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Trump wants adulation, not conquest. Push come to shove you can get him out of the oval office by making him figurehead Emperor, as long as it comes with immunity he’ll accept.

          On a scale of Mussolini to Hitler, he’s like 250% towards Mussolini.

      • glowinfly@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 day ago

        4 years if laws and constitution stay the same and are followed… first term he had people alienated into him who were at least slightly appropriated for their positions, this time people who has nothing to do with their positions are being appointed simply for being loyal to him… Let’s see if any of them won’t let him do anything drastic within 4 YEARS

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        71
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, most people are going to live their lives and see absolutely no effect from anything done. No single administration has the ability to totally fuck up the country in the amount of time they have. That’s why you get the big swings back and forth between the two parties. Also, the news is very good at sensationalizing absolutely everything and making you think that, oh my god, it’s the end of the fucking world. What are we going to do? Run around like chickens screaming with our heads cut off and shit.

        • Baggins@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          22 hours ago

          No single administration has the ability to totally fuck up the country in the amount of time they have.

          Trump: “Hold my Diet Coke”.

        • trajekolus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          60
          ·
          1 day ago

          We know that Ukraine will be betrayed by the Trump government. A Russian victory will embolden Russia to further threaten Europe. This will also embolden China and other authoritarian states.

          We also know a Trump government will stop climate action. Unfortunately, this will also signal to many other governments that they can do the same.

          We also know that immense cruelties will be perpetrated such as the family separation policy of the 1st Trump presidency

          But yes, if you are white, straight and middle class or rich, you’ll be able to think all is OK until such time as the authoritarian ascendancy led by China and Russia affects your own life, which might be a decade or more away.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            48
            ·
            1 day ago

            How many people do you think would be affected by his deportation policies? I’ve heard a number of around 10 million, and that’s 3% of the population, which, while absolutely terrible, means that the other 97% isn’t going to really care.

            • zephorah@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Food prices will go up, not down. I think everyone cares about food prices right now.

              I’m not just talking about outdoor crop picking work. A friend was laid off from a food production company this week and Trumps not even sworn in yet. You can’t make this stuff up it’s so ridiculous. So, anticipate job losses for non immigrants as well.

              2/3 of the factory line is Hispanic, and the majority of that is rotating work visa people. In this way, you can pay much lower wages.

              Part of it was tariff threat, no one would place orders, everyone’s on hold on the production/supply/buyer chain, waiting for January, so the income of the business dropped to zero this week and is projected to stay there through January. Again, this is food production, not bread or flour, or anything basic like that, but it’s still food.

              So, with no income and the threat of loss of cheap production labor, all the American citizens were laid off this week. Whether or not the business will eventually declare bankruptcy is undecided, but that talk is definitely on the table.

            • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              46
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Those 3% (going by your math):

              Pick crops

              Contribute $90 billion or more in tax for the county via sales tax.

              Without those people, we have no food, and immediate inflation begins. You know, the thing everyone was bitching about that was literally caused by Trumps inaction on COVID.

              This affects EVERYONE in the US.

                • zephorah@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  I did just get a roof put on my house. Small, local business. All the office people were white, the work crew was 100% Hispanic with one bilingual guy who front manned communication. Idk how many were work visa, but given the number of serious injuries I’ve seen from work visas falling off roofs while doing construction and such while at work, it’s not just one company.

                  And before you go down the path of “they’re taking ‘our’ jobs” remember that there is a shortage of skilled labor and trades right now.

                  Also, if a company can pay at or near minimum wage for rappelling up the side of house, would you accept that wage given the liability/injury threat?

                  Housing prices go up in reaction to losing cheap labor, I guarantee it.

            • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              “Stimpy, sometimes your wealth of ignorance astounds me.” – Ren Höek

            • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 day ago

              I know the last time he was in office his immigration policies made it impossible for some people families to come over. I worked with a couple people struggling with that.

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          No single administration has the ability to totally fuck up the country in the amount of time they have.

          Women in need of reproductive health services in red states would like a word.

        • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          [Deleted]

          I’ve made a huge mistake breaking my personal rule to avoid all political content and I’ve regretted that immediately

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            1 day ago

            Trump was already elected before and quickly became irrelevant after his 4 years.

            And who is going to be the next US President?

            And who is nominating a Russian asset to be DNI?

            And who is nominating a child sex trafficker to be AG?

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 hours ago

              And who is likely to nominate an antivax, anti-science lunatic with brain worms to head the dept of Health and Human Services?

              And who is planning to eliminate the department of education and NOAA?

              Previous administrations have done damage through incompetence and/or malice, but the plan this time is on another level. They’re going in with the goal of breaking everything.

          • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Dobbs and Chevron would disagree with your claim of “irrelevant”. You might not be aware, but that’s not the same thing…

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You mean head of DOGE? Because we live in the timeline where a terminally online edgelord with the brain of a 14yo and the body of a 54yo makes meme government agencies.

      Anyway, get your passport now. They’re good for ten years, enough to last at least through the tentative end of Trump’s circus.

  • BMTea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It needs A) same functionality B) ban all forms of racism, especially Zionism and C) refuse investment from undemocratic nations like GCC or China

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That’s not going to happen here. Am I the only one who watched Trumps speech claiming to be about 1A? He is coming for social media day 1, to reinforce Elon Musk, not only on Twitter, but all other large social media platforms (he doesn’t name FB and Reddit, but he’s talking about FB and Reddit, maybe as far down as Lemmy, BlueSky & Mastadon too, idk).

      He says he’s going to mobilize “my Department of Justice” to do it.

      He specifically says: making account removal/banning only possible via court order, removing moderation, and removing any labels of misinformation or disinformation.

      He’s already threatening YouTube with removal of section 230, if they moderate content.

      Why is no one talking about this?

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s a YouTube video of his speech. Asmongold has a reaction video as do other people who make their living on YouTube, but the shortest take is the original posted by that dipshit RFK Jr. 6min. Only 234k views, probably because it’s buried on RFK Jrs bullshit. It’s the vid with the giant green crayon all caps subtitles. Idk why they captioned it that way, but, they did.

          https://youtu.be/xJfUXVOoFBo?si=7zP2Et5QGSt5dW20

      • BMTea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        They should definitely not allow investment from anyone associated with Trump admin, the Pentagon etc.

      • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        20 hours ago

        What’s with the consistent amount of “American Democracy is dead” rhetoric I’ve been seeing lately? It’s not like Trump is president yet. And sure, Biden isn’t going to make too much impact as a lame duck, but even after Trump takes office again, there’s a lot he can do, and a whole lot more he won’t be able to. The power is still in the hands of the people, especially at the local level. America’s democracy isn’t dead, and saying anything of the sort is obeying in advance.

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Oh you sweet summer child.

          A key component of 2016-2020 was Trump was surrounded by people who wouldn’t, including generals who wouldn’t entertain his talk of maybe using nukes. It’s not that he couldn’t in 2016-2020, it’s that he was surrounded by people who wouldn’t and he didn’t know how himself.

          That’s no longer the case. And the people around him have studied up on how.

          One of his first big speeches post win this week, claiming to be about defending 1A, he states he’s going to use/mobilize “my Department of Justice” to prosecute anyone trying to enforce the Hatch Act. The Hatch Act is the thing that keeps polling locations safe and neutral. The Hatch Act prevents the threatening of voters in or within 100yds of polling locations, as well as making the buying of votes illegal. That latter part keeps voting free.

          Think about the possibilities. Think hard. In fact, if you’re a creative type, sit down and write a short story about what that could look like on the present political climate.

          He’s reading a script, the entire speech lacks his usual meandering bullshit. It’s cagey. He totally didn’t write it. The only piece that smells like trump is the piece about no longer being able to ban social media accounts without a court order, probably because that’s personal for him.

          And remember. SCOTUS basically said he can do anything while President without fear of prosecution. It’s simply that Biden is unwilling to go there that we haven’t seen what that looks like yet.

          I don’t read hard left media for this info. I listen to direct talk, from Trump, from his people, and listen to/read interviews with individuals in or very close to the 2016-2020 term. I then find a historian or lawyer who can add nuance. I then read the hive mind of We The People and other countries for more perspective.

        • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Have you seen Project 2025, Trump’s unofficial but kind of official election plan? Republicans have all three branches of government now. They would have to willingly choose to not follow their own proposed plan, and there’s no reason to do that. So, logically, they will execute it - and that’s it. The end of US democracy.

          Go read it or summaries of it if you think it’s hyperbole.

          • zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It’s not a bullet list or headline so they’re going to continue to ignore all 996 pages of it.

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yea, have you heard about project 2025?

          With choosing trump, the American people have chosen that they approve that project.

          At least, so do I see it.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          If you tell people now that Democracy is dead, they don’t bother fighting the real fight, if and when push comes to shove.

          Dems said this election is the end of Democracy, but still put an uninspiring right candidate. They said Trump is the fascist danger to all the US stands for. But having him and his crownies dismantled by getting criminal charges on them seemed to go too far. When grassroots movements came up and demanded change instead of embracing them, taking them seriously and talking with them properly, they were shunned and pushed down.

          Now the greatest danger to corporate America are people to start organizing and taking to the streets. So hammer down the defeatist message, so the people suck up to their corporate overlords. The corporate overlords who won yet another election as both candidates represented their class interests.

          • zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I just don’t see how that broken down old man who says they’re eating the cats and dogs is inspiring to anyone. But then I don’t vote on inertia.

            • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Because Trump voters are poorly educated, and frankly, stupid.

              You heard something about eating cats and dogs, they heard someone telling them that Those people they don’t like are doing horrible things, and he will make things even with Those people.

              Literally a dog whistle, but you have to be a blithering moron to understand it, because anyone who isn’t just hears a senile old dumbass saying stupid shit.

              • zephorah@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                One of my parents, not Trumpers in spite of age, thinks Vance is trolling him to 25th him later. Either way, that tired, not looking too good medically, old man isn’t likely for long going forward. I think this is a Vance, Heritage, Musk game. Game in full essence of the word where Musk is concerned. That egomaniacal child of Apartheid is even playing with Putin. Evidence even of thwarting Ukraine insofar as he is able.

                • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I’m not sure I buy that: Trump is a cult, and his cultists are going to have an absolute riotous fit if someone tries to depose him.

                  Short of him dying or doing something you just can’t ignore - like, say, he eats shit out of his diaper on national tv - he’s not going anywhere.

                  Vance isn’t smart enough to 6D chess his way into the presidency without his nominal constituency rioting over it, so I’m doubtful that’s his play.

                  He’s probably just going to pull the last-guy-in-the-room thing, since that’s the only person Trump listens to or remembers anyway which means you keep the cultists happy AND you get the figurehead to do what you want anyways without the mess.

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            All you are describing really only suggests that American democracy has been dead for even longer, not that it isn’t dead yet.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      yeah I don’t think a usa based platform is really “long gaming” the fee speech problem. Bluesky now shifting to monetization plans. Its a matter of time until some rich dildo buys it up. If were lucky it will be mark cuban or somebody buts its still grim prospects.

      • SuperEars@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        “Fee speech” is a serendipitous typo. Or maybe you meant it. First I’ve heard it, anyway.

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Cuban has deleted much of his anti trump talk, high odds the man is hunkering down.

        Remember, trumps been promising vengeance to “enemies” for well over a year now, and now he has immunity from prosecution.

      • BMTea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If I was being honest I’d add “literally anyone whos firm has any connections to a NATO government” but then I’d be called a consoiracy theorist. But as for GCC, that’s a more direct threat to lives of dissidents.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Bsky federates. I follow several people from my Mastodon profile.

      Edit: I should add a caveat here. Federation doesn’t work as smoothly as Threads yet. You have to use a bridge service: https://fed.brid.gy/

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        For now. They’re still in their growth phase. If they ever become dominant and they need to make money, they’ll turn into a walled garden like every other. Everyone seems to forget that Twitter, Reddit and Facebook were also all about openness at the start

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Absolutely, I don’t trust them at all. There’s a reason I’m on Mastodon and not either of the corporate platforms. It is nice to at least be able to follow people there though, and interact with them.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        The bridge is necessary because BlueSky and Mastodon cannot federate, and they never will be able to. ActivityPub and ATProto are different protocols.

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          “Never” is a strong word. API translation is a technical hurdle, but rarely an insurmountable one. If Blue Sky wanted to add an ActivityPub interface to their platform, they probably could.

          This issue isn’t technical per se; it’s a matter of priorities. Blue Sky doesn’t want to federate with Mastodon/Threads, because they want users to switch to their platform.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, well that’s good anyway. Is it true that they only have like one major server? Because I’ve heard that, but I haven’t looked much into them, so I’m not sure if it’s still the case or not. To my understanding, they are meant to be a federated network, but really only have the one server.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Of course it is, why would people throw millions at investing in a product and then decentralize it to the point that there weren’t any bottlenecks to apply pressure and extract a profit back out of it? It makes no sense and would be a ridiculous business strategy.

          What is a good business strategy is associating your product with visions of decentralization while never truly intending to get there in practice.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Fair point. They will just grow their user base and then go all walled garden just like all the rest of the platforms. Protocols not platforms.

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah this is still true as far as I know. Honestly this is probably what allowed BS to gain a foothold; I like mastodon too but asking new users to pick a server was always going to be a source of adoption friction.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          AFAIK that’s still the case, yes. I don’t have a Bluesky (or Threads) account so I can’t confirm.

      • glowinfly@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Not only federates but can also be partially self-hosted and is also open-source - by the way, I don’t mean it’s perfect but a lot better to reach people from there than Twitter, but be wary of this), anyone knowledgeable of US politics will know the names mentioned and how shady it looks. I still think Mastodon isn’t ready for this kins of exodus. People who waited this long to leave either wants convenience or is waiting for some of the people they follow go elsewhere, or both. Mastodon has too many mobile apps options, BlueSky official app is so much closer to how Twitter looks like and people are used to and don’t need to choosee instance as it already comes pre-selected by default (although people can change). Then comes the issue of scability if there was an instance to be the “default” for these people who just want quick and convenient alternative, will it be able to handle this much people at once? I have no idea but I doubt it. Most of us who go find alternative in the Fediverse is aware privacy-focused alternatives usually more than often comes at the price of convenience, not really the mindset those people are in, hopefully some of them get into it by learning what decentralization is from BlueSky?

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Has an aggressively unpleasant user base and nowhere near the blocking functionality that Bluesky has, which is essentially mandatory now for minorities on the internet. Not to mention an onboarding process that can confuse the tech literate, much less the average person.

      This comment is not an invitation to talk about how actually it’s very simple and intuitive if you follow a 20 step process that relies on detailed knowledge of how federation works.

      • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Don’t forget the disproportionate control individual mods have over the network due to the shared defederation lists. I was on a general purpose instance which found itself defederated from a large part of the network because a mastodon.art admin had disagreement with a mod on the one I was on.

        • mke@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Putting aside control and anecdotes, neither of which would be fair to comment on without more context and a lengthier discussion, this breaks the email metaphor a bit, doesn’t it?

          The Fediverse is just like email, where we all talk to each other, except Outlook blocked Gmail because MS and Google had a fight during a meeting so you’re gonna have to migrate to Yahoo or learn to self-host.

          That’s not necessarily a criticism, I just find it funny.

      • USSMojave@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I think it’s easy to understand Mastodon, or any federated service, using a metaphor for a country or large place, where you can say “I want to move to X country” but then you have to actually pick a place IN that country to live, like a specific city or rural district. Once you decide on your instance, it’s really not that hard

        • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          As a progressive worldly usa person which instance should I choose?

          Can or should it be tied to my lemmy.world instance somehow?

          Thx

      • muppeth@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You dont need to explain email so federation does not seem to be the issue here IMO. The problem is money which FLOSS projects usually don’t have. The successful ones have perhaps enough so that the devs can put food on their table, but not much else. Most of the apps are after Dayjob hobby projects. It’s hard to compete with those who have teams of paid staff.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Those people will either learn one day or they will end up in the same vicious cycle over and over again for the rest of their lives until they do learn the lesson or die. The only reason the blue sky process is better is because, at least currently, they only have the one server. If it ever actually federates, like it’s supposed to, then that point is completely moot. Because then they won’t know how to sign up for blue sky either.

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh no, not the same thing I’ve been doing since the mid 90s! I might die if I migrate sites again! Or something.

          Making a social network only usable by around 5% of the population and then complaining when only 5% of the population shows up is a pretty indicative attitude of why so many FOSS projects struggle to get widespread adoption. You don’t get to choose how tech literate the population is. You either make it more useable or you accept a limited audience.

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Clown take. “People should just get smart!”

          95% of all American adults cannot use search functions in email.